By Airwaves writer Taylor Penwell
The dust from the summer program might be settling but if you are involved in a junior sailing summer program, you know that it requires year round attention.
Of course the best situation your club could be in is that the junior sailing director, head instructor or whoever runs the day-to-day operation of the sailing program, has done well and has agreed to come back for summer 2017.
If you aren’t lucky enough to have a person returning for the position, then it is time to start looking for the next candidate. Lets look at the possible timeline. If you listed the job posting the beginning of this November, it would take the hiring committee members a number of weeks to accept, review, interview and discuss the candidates. This process can done as quickly as a few weeks or can last months, often with the hiring committee left scrambling for a person when the summer program is about to start.
For this article we will say it will take two months to hire a suitable candidate for the job. Now it’s January of 2017. If the new leader is coming from outside the program, they’ll have to be brought up to speed on the program, its history, and how the basic operation has been running and their expectations for the next summer. Even if the person is being promoted from inside the program, they have to familiarize themselves with what is to be expected. No one can fully understand all the expectations until they day they take the position.
The director/head instructor’s next step after familiarizing themselves with the program is to staff their instructors and coaches. They should start by deciding whom from last year’s staff they would like to have for the next summer. This is where communication between the old director/head instructor and new one is important. They can discuss staff member’s strengths and weaknesses. Next, offers should be made to those staff members who will fit next year’s programs visions. It is imperative that these offers start to be sent as soon as can be. These offers should start being made in January.
Most junior sailing programs staff consists of young members in high school, college, or recent college graduates. In my experience as a head instructor I have found two common problems when staffing the junior sailing program. The first problem is that candidates change their minds. People will often agree to the job only to back out when the summer is right around the corner. The second problem is that people have plans for their summers a long time in advance. This could include studying abroad, traveling or maybe working at a different yacht club and if that happens you are already too late!
When you start sending offers to potential returning staff members it is important to give them a deadline for when they need to decide if they want to return or not for the following summer. I recommend giving them four to six weeks to decide before you open up the position for new candidates. The four to six weeks shows your loyalty for current staff and is a sign of respect. If after the decision period is over, it is time to start sending offers to other candidates for the position. New staff candidates should be interviewed to see if they fit the program needs. They should be made offers and given the same timeline for making a decision.
It is never too early to have staffed your summer program. That is if you have the returning staff and new staff members you are satisfied with. Just like the saying goes, the earlier, the better. It will give you room to work with if the staff hiring process takes longer than expected, or like mentioned earlier, you have someone bail.
Remember to use Sail1Design for posting all job vacancies for your program! Sail1Design is the best place to list for all jobs concerning junior sailing. Sail1Design is also a great place to list your resume for programs and yacht clubs to search for needed candidates. http://sailingjobs.sail1design.com/
We also have a very deep and large RESUME DATABASE available!
Thanks for reading and happy hunting!
Coaches Locker Room: The Importance of Teaching Sportsmanship To Our Young Sailors
By Airwaves writer Racheel Bennung
Coaching sailing is a great job, whether you do it full time, part time, or seasonal, nothing is greater than being on the water teaching our youth the joy of sailing. However, sailing can also be one of toughest sports to teach. One of the biggest reasons for this is because we are a self-policing sport. You won’t see any referees or umpires out on the course most of the time, so we as sailors must be honest and sportsmanlike on the water. This can be a hard concept to teach young sailors, since most other sports have someone else making the calls for their mistakes. Now they must be honest even when maybe no one saw their foul. This is why teaching the rules and sportsmanship to our young sailors is so important, and will lead to better and honest sailors.
Before we step into the racing rules section, we have the basic principles of sailing. The first one is titled Sportsmanship and the Rules, and states, “Competitors in the sport of sailing are governed by a body of rules that they are expected to follow and enforce. A fundamental principle of sportsmanship is that when competitors break a rule they will promptly take a penalty, which may be to retire.” Right here you see how important it is to teach these to your sailors. I personally don’t think coaches spend enough time teaching these, and I think one reason is they don’t know where to start. So today you are going to learn the best ways to teach the rules and sportsmanship to your young sailors. After all it’s one of the basic principles of sailing!
Let us begin with teaching the rules to your sailors. The rules are complicated, and a challenge to teach to your sailors. Even sailors who have been sailing all their lives have to look at the rule book to check themselves now and again. So how do you teach this complicated subject to your young sailors. Below are three tips for how best to teach your sailors the rules of sailing.
Tip #1: Make it age and ability appropriate
First thing is you want to make sure you are teaching your group appropriately. Teaching the rules to beginners that are 8 years old and beginners that are 14 years old are going to done very differently. So first, you want to identify your group and build your lesson plan off their age and ability. For beginners that are young, you should start with visuals lessons on what the rules are. You want to make sure you are going over the basics and not getting to in-depth. Intermediate groups that are a little older you can dive a little deeper, and start getting into what the rules state in the rule book. Make sure you stick to the bigger rules that they would see out on the race course. For our advanced sailors that are older you can get more into the rule book. You can have longer chalk talks, and really get into the nitty gritty of the rules.
Tip #2: Use the indoors, outdoors, and on the water to teach
Teaching the rules to young sailors needs to be interactive. We need to incorporate them into the teaching so they
can understand the different situations better. Teaching the rules can be done not only inside, but outdoors and on the water. Some of the way you can teach the rules indoors is; a chalk talk on a specific rule, playing out situations with magnetic boats and marks, watching videos of situations, mock protest hearings, and quizzes. How you can teach the rules outdoors is; use actual boats on land to set up situations, and set up situations with real marks, starting lines, and making the sailors act as the boats. Teaching the rules on the water can be done with many different drills some are; short starting line, box drill, favored end of the line, and small course drills.
Tip #3: Make it fun
Making the rules fun is very important! If you just give your group a chalk talk on the rules every once in a while they will have a pretty boring time. So you want to make it interactive and fun for your group. Getting them involved and having fun with learning the rules will enable them to retain the information better then you just lecturing them. Lectures are important, and should be done, however, we need to make it fun for our sailors so they want to learn more!
Now how to do you teach good sportsmanship to your young sailors? As a young sailor it can be hard for them to grasp the concept of: “I hit a mark and no one saw it do I really have to spin?” We need to explain in great detail the importance of sportsmanship out on the water to our sailors. This is the foundation of the rule book, and we need to share its importance to our sailors every time they get on the water. Some great ways and things to teach sportsmanship to your sailors are:
- Team building activities.
- Talk as a whole on what makes a good sport.
- Teach your sailors its not all about winning.
- Teach your sailors that sportsmanship also means not only following the rules, but enforcing them.
It is so important to teach your sailors the rules and sportsmanship. This is no easy task as they can be both difficult to teach and difficult for your group to understand. However, we need to recognize their importance, and make sure we are spending time teaching them to our sailors in a way they will understand. The rules and sportsmanship are the foundation of sailing, and with us being the umpires out on the water it makes it one of the most unique parts of sailing. When teaching the rules we need to make sure we make it age and ability appropriate, use the indoors, outdoors, and the water to teach, and finally, make it fun! Sportsmanship is a tough one to teach young sailors, but by making it interactive with team building activities and talking about what makes a good sport we can accomplish the goal. Coaching is a great job, but no easy task by using these tips you are sure to have an easier and FUN job of teaching the rules and sportsmanship to your sailors.
Notice of Meeting: College Sailing 101: Inside the World of College Sailing for Prospective College Sailors
Don’t delay in registering; last year’s event was SOLD OUT! Parents are encouraged to attend. Click to register. ALL student athletes MUST register. Parents are welcomed to attend and do NOT need to register.
Current List (this will grow) of attending colleges:
| Tufts University |
| Brown University |
| Georgetown |
| St. Mary’s College |
| Bowdoin College |
| Mitchell College |
| George Washington U. |
| Old Dominion U. |
| Hobart/William Smith |
| Connecticut College |
| Gannon |
| USMMA – Kings Point |
| Fordham |
| U. Pennsylvania |
| Washington College |
| US Naval Academy |
| Roger Williams |
| SUNY Maritime |
| Syracuse |
| U. Rhode Island |
| Christopher Newport Middlebury |
| Stony Brook |
| UMBC |
| Drexel |
https://www.sail1design.com/event/college-sailing-101-inside-world-college-sailing-prospective-college-sailors/?instance_id=8723
Club Profile: Hudson River Community Sailing
In a Nutshell
Founded in 2007 to serve the urban community, we partner with public schools to offer credit-bearing academic programs, internships, mentoring, and college readiness. Our youth development platform uses sailing, boat operation, and boat building to further academic skills and instill the qualities of character necessary for college and career success. We also serve the broader community through affordable marine education and recreation for individuals, groups, schools, businesses, and families.
NewsFlash: HRCS is Hiring Sailing Instructors!
HRCS Mission
Hudson River Community Sailing develops leadership and academic success in underserved New York City youth through sailing education and provides maritime education and recreation to the community at large.
We have ten J/24s sailboats, the most popular keelboats in the world. They are small boats that are fast and sporty, while being stable and safe. The J/24 is typically crewed by 5 people. Get in on the fun and find out why the J/24 is a great boat to learn the ropes on!
Our facility is an award winning pier and boathouse, located on the western side of the West Side Highway at 26th Street. We are an affiliate of New York River Sports, making up the most unique water sport access point in our city.
From Battery Park to mid-town, Hudson River Park is enriching the relationship of New York City residents and guests with their waterfront. A full description of current and future plans are available at their website.
NewsFlash: HRCS is Hiring Sailing Instructors!
The Aluminium Cocktail: What Goes Into The Perfect Mast
By Mark Jardine of Yachts & Yachting
While carbon is the ‘sexy’ material of choice for spars, aluminium accounts for a far greater proportion of the masts and booms used in sailing and is much cheaper. What goes into an aluminium mast, and the processes to consistently produce a good spar, though are far from simple – like a good cocktail, the mix of ingredients and the production processes are vital. We spoke to Selden’s Steve Norbury and Andy McCormack to find out more…
Firstly we talked to Steve about aluminium itself and where masts sit in the different ‘series’ available to a manufacturer.
“Over time masts have been made from quite a different number of series of aluminium, all to have different properties. The series of aluminium that is mostly used for mast manufacture, and what we use is 6000 series. The 6000 is relatively hard, extrudes well, is heat treatable and has good corrosion resistance. This means that we can buy them in a soft condition so that we can work with them, and then heat treatment brings them up to full strength. So overall, 6000 series aluminium is reckoned to be the best to make dinghy and yacht spars from.
“There are other families; the 2000 series is a copper-based aluminium and is also very strong. You would think they would make ideal masts, but unfortunately, they have terrible corrosion resistance. If you stored your mast in a bag, maybe for the Winter, you would literally open up that bag in the Spring and find that you had a pile of white powder!
“Another series which is used, is 7000 series. 7000 series has the advantage over the 6000 series in that its yield point is high. That means it is a very strong metal that you can bend further without it taking a permanent set. The disadvantage is that it is almost impossible to work with. You can buy 7000 series round tube, but you can’t get profile section, you can’t taper it, you can’t weld it, and again it has a corrosion problem in that after a few years you would find that your fittings start corroding. So it has been used for windsurfing masts and used for some Optimist spars, but, generally for dinghy spars 6000 is the best material that you can use.”
Andy McCormack is Technical Director at Selden and we asked him how you go about extruding a mast into a particular section.
“We have a range of sections, seven or eight, covering the entire dinghy range; some of them are very close together. Cumulus is our most popular section, we also have another section called Alto which is very slightly stiffer, and one called Zeta, which is slightly more flexible – they are very, very close together. Due to the volume of aluminium that we buy, we are able to have three separate dies, that are discrete sections, but very, very close, just a few percent stiffer or more flexible each way.”
With this range of sections, and having masts that are very similar in their characteristics, we wanted to know how they could ensure repeatability, managing to produce the same mast each time. Andy explains:
“Due to the volume of aluminium extrusions that we buy, we have a tighter set of tolerances that we have agreed with our supplier. Rather than using a British Standard or ISO Standard, we have a Selden Spar standard, which governs overall dimensions, wall thickness, straightness, material properties, and this standard is much tighter than commercially agreed standards that other people may use.”
The next problem for repeatability is when a mast section is tapered. This requires a cut and weld in a spar and we wanted to know how they kept the same mast characteristics each time. Andy told us about the technology Selden use to improve consistency:
“Rather than cutting the taper by hand, we have a plasma cutting machine, essentially a CNC machine, cutting a section out of the top of the mast, very accurately and consistently.
“We then press that together on a custom tooling for each section. After that the taper is welded on an auto welder – again, this is the same every time. This results in very tight tolerances and is completely repeatable; there is no human intervention.
The final stage of creating a mast is having it heat-treated and then anodized. Andy explains how Selden go about this process:
“We have our own heat treatment oven that is computer controlled with sensors clipped to mast tubes. This produces a graph of the heat cycle for every run. This way we can be certain that the material in the oven has been correctly heat treated.
We carry out a peening operation which gives us a uniform surface finish, it also removes any impurities off the surface of the material. That allows us to send it for anodizing in a state where they have to do the absolute minimum of cleaning and etching, meaning there is no further reduction in material before the anodizing is put on.”
Like all industries and companies, aluminium spar making is moving on, and Selden are at the forefront of experimentation and innovation. We asked Steve what changes are in the pipeline:
“We are all always working with our extruder to develop new modifications to this, or new blends if you like. We are working on some material now, which gives us a much higher yield point – for a dinghy sailor means that a mast will bend further before taking a permanent set. So while we are trying to improve that, we are also trying to retain its surface finish and its anodizing properties.”
Finally we wanted to dispel some myths about aluminium masts, particularly with regard to bend and gust response. Steve explained the facts to us:
“Gust response is all about when a gust hits, the masts bends, and when the gust disappears, the mast bends back. It is all about the stiffness of the material, the weight of the material, and pretty much nothing else. If you look at the formula, it’s the stiffness of the material which is the most important factor.
With aluminium there are very marginal differences in stiffness. But there are massive differences in their yield point – the point you can bend something to before it takes a permanent set. So aluminium masts are all the same stiffness, but they could have a different yield point.”
Selden are the biggest spar manufacturer in the world and work closely with their extruder on experimenting with the ‘mix’ in their masts. It is the volume of work that gives them the flexibility to do this as Steve explains:
“All our dinghy sections come from one extruder and we use many more tonnes of aluminium a year, making us a big enough customer to work with to develop spars with new proprieties. We can make a trial run of a section in a particular material, whereas I doubt they would do that for some smaller manufacturers.”
www.seldenmast.co.uk
Originally published in Yachts & Yachting, and re-printed with permission here
Club Profile: Sandy Bay Yacht Club
NewsFlash: Sandy Bay Yacht Club is Hiring a Jr. Sailing Program Director
JR SAILING AT SBYC
The Mission of the Sandy Bay Sailing Program is to give our students a broad exposure to the sport of sailing. Our primary goal is to develop, safe, independent sailors, by offering them an active and exciting experience that builds camaraderie, sportsmanship, and self-reliance.
Our secondary goal is to offer those students who have become independent sailors exposure to racing through our racing classes and teams. The desired result of the program is students with a love of the sport of sailing and the SBYC experience.
Our Junior Program uses 18 Optimist dinghies and 9 420’s. These dinghies are the choice of yacht clubs and sailing programs nationwide. They offer the student a sturdy platform on which to learn, while providing enough challenge to keep competent racers involved in the sport. Juniors are grouped by ability and there is a place for everyone including 8 year old beginners, older 13 or 14 year old beginners, right on up to the seasoned racer. Our racing programs offer experienced sailors the opportunity to travel locally and regionally, competing against other sailors their own age.
In addition to wonderful sailing opportunities, Sandy Bay Yacht Club offers excellent social opportunities. All students become members of the Club (although parents are not required to become members, we encourage them to join). We encourage you to take advantage of junior cookouts, Sunday Morning Coffees, Chowder Day, and numerous other dinners and events. Sailing is a social sport, and there’s no better place to get started than Sandy Bay Yacht Club.
NewsFlash: Sandy Bay Yacht Club is Hiring a Jr. Sailing Program Director
HISTORY OF SBYC
Founded in 1885, SBYC is located in the scenic and historic coastal town of Rockport, Massachusetts. As an active sailing club, SBYC has numerous one-design and cruising sailboats racing in regular Wednesday evening and weekend races, as well as annual Club regattas and frequent club sponsored District and National Regattas. An active social program complements these events.
Our sailing program provides basic through advanced training for both juniors and adults. Its purpose is to give our students a broad exposure to the sport of sailing, develop safe, independent sailors, offer exposure to racing, and to instill a love of the sport of sailing.
Open from mid-April through mid-October, Sandy Bay Yacht Club is located north of http://www.boston.com/ on http://www.cape-ann.com/, at the end of T Wharf in Rockport Harbor where our current Clubhouse was built in 1930. A newspaper clipping from the May 22, 1885 “Advertiser” states:
“The Sandy Bay Yacht Club held its initial meeting for permanent organization last Monday evening. There was a good attendance, and the following gentlemen were chosen officers: Leander M. Haskins, Commodore; Howard H. Haul, Fleet Captain; Lemuel Clark, Measurer; Chas. Mills, Secretary and Treasurer. Regatta Committee – Chas. Cunningham, G.T. Margeson, Grafton Butman, Wm. Hale, H.H. Paul. A meeting will be held next Monday evening at the Club Room, Haskins’ Block.”
Since that time we have been actively involved in sailboat racing and training, for both juniors and adults.
Over the years both our one-design fleets and cruising boats have changed and kept up with the times. Our current one-design fleets are: Bullseyes, Club 420s, Flying Scots, Lasers, Optimists, Rhodes 19s and Stars. Racing under PHRF rules, our cruising fleet includes numerous designs from 23 to 44 feet. Along with our regular series racing, SBYC has hosted numerous one-design Championships, including District as well as National Events.
Begun in the 1930s, our Sailing Program has grown rapidly over the last several years. We now accommodate approximately 175 different kids sailing in Optimists, Club 420s and Lasers and 35 adults learning to sail in Rhodes 19s and Bullseyes. Many of our students have become accomplished sailors and racers.
Not all of our activity is sailing around the buoys, pleasure sailing or even chasing down that prized http://www.sandybay.org/stripers.shtml. There are numerous social activities to enjoy while ashore, ranging from potluck or catered dinners to our well attended Sunday morning coffees. Juniors also have numerous social events to choose from, including cookouts and movie nights.
With thanks to James Runkle and Harry Whalen, the following history is excerpted from their book “100 Years of Sailing at Sandy Bay”, published in 1985:
Cleopatra had her barge. But it was not until recent times that many pleasure sailors had their “barges” and had a need or desire to pool forces with other pleasure sailors. “Where did you get that aluminum mast? Is it strong enough?” And the next day, “Hey, someone tow me back to the dock – my aluminum mast broke!” Or to see which boat is faster – how can you race without someone to race with? How can the race be fair without rules? And so the need grows for some kind of organization.
“Summer cottages with an ocean view” were all the rage in 1885 along the North Shore of Massachusetts Bay. White-collar workers of Boston, New York and the Midwest had incomes sufficient to support their dreams of a second home by the sea. And from these they went forth to summer fun on boats, competing in local and inter-area regattas. Active fleets emerged in Marblehead, Manchester, Gloucester, Rockport and Newburyport.
In 1885 Annisquam challenged Rockport to a race around Thacher’s. Annisquam must have had an organization to issue the challenge; Rockport must have had one to accept it. So we say a sailing club, from which ours is descended, existed here in 1885.
Like so many legends of the sea, the Sandy Bay Yacht Club seems just to have appeared. Marshall Swan’s “TOWN ON SANDY BAY” says on page 221 that, riding on the crest of interest in yachting during the 1870s and 1880s, it was founded in 1885. There is the legend mentioned above that refers to the challenge from Annisquam. By 1887 there was a public announcement of a Regatta, “Open to all Boats entered in the Sandy Bay Yacht Club”, to be sailed off Rockport Saturday, July 9th, 1887. The Second Grand Annual Regatta, “Open to all Yachts of 30 feet and under, Sailing Length” was “To be Sailed off Rockport Monday August 1st, 1887, Commencing at 1 o’clock, sharp.”
The Regatta of July 9, 1887, listed two classes, with the proviso that “Two boats must compete in each class or no race. Three boats must compete or no second prize.” The first class consisted of yachts measuring 20 and less than 30 feet, with the first prize the Harwood Cup valued at $40, and a second prize of $10. In the second class were “Yachts measuring less than 20 feet,” with the first prize $15 cash and the second $10 (presumably also cash). The club course was about six miles, with both classes going over the course twice. There is a note that PROTESTS “must be made to the Judges within one hour after the races. Judges’ decisions will be final.”
According to Swan, in August 1883 four yachts had raced around Tha(t)cher’s Island. By July 1886 “The club had 35 boats with new ones to be added.” And in 1887 a Sailing Dory club was formed. The ADVERTISER commented that “Few clubs along the coast can or will show a better lot of prizes than Sandy Bay has now on exhibition.”Robinson’s HISTORY OF MARBLEHEAD mentions a regatta in Rockport in 1885; a framed placard at the Yacht Club advertises a special regatta from Sandy Bay to Newburyport for the Cunningham Cup in 1886. Fliers similar to this have been found in Yacht Club archives announcing regattas in Rockport.
1885 is the same year they began work on the outer breakwater that was to provide a “Harbor of Refuge” large enough to contain the entire Atlantic Fleet. Some years later, Teddy Roosevelt’s ‘Great White Fleet’ would indeed anchor there. Photographs of that time show all the sailboats gaff rigged, with a bowsprit and a straight stem. So we have a good idea what our earlier club members’ boats looked like.
Since the nineteenth century, of course, fashions have changed in hulls and rigging. As various types of racing craft have been developed, pleasure sailors of Rockport have kept up with them. The Club has provided classes to keep all the racing compatible and according to rules. And, in testimony to the interest and vigor with which Rockporters pursued their boating, we note that in 1905 the “Law and Order League” was vexed that Sunday yacht racing was increasingly common.
We have this degree of documentation as to the founding and existence of our club. But until 1930 details of sailing at Sandy Bay are incomplete and unreliable. the yacht club organization lacked formality; interest seems to have ebbed and flowed like the tide. The result is that few written records have been found, and that even the remarkable memories of our ninety-year-olds cannot be expected to stretch back farther than 1910.
We must rely on what information can be gleaned from a study of these other yachting club histories and a close examination of the old photographs of Rockport Harbor, which gives us a fair picture of racing sloops of the time. Few of these boats were exactly alike, as we would expect today of the boats in a racing “class”. “Official measurers” and “handicaps” were the lingo of standard operating procedures. Just as with racing horses, racing sailboats were really the hobbies of the well-to-do. And naval architects emerged as the creators of these “rich man’s toys”, Herreshoff and Crowninshield being two of the famous.
In the original regattas sponsored by Sandy Bay in 1887, entries were limited to boats under 30 feet in length, usually in two or three classes. The first class included boats of 24 to 30 feet; the second, 21 to 24 feet, and the third, boats under 21 feet. When the owner of a boat found that he and his paid skipper consistently came in last, it behooved him to get a new skipper or a newly designed boat.
After 1915 boats of a given design were being built according to the same specifications, so that the results of races would be based on the skill of the skipper and crew in sailing a standardized craft over a clearly marked course and under the same prevailing conditions of wind and weather. As the Star class and Bird class proliferated in Sandy Bay, the club measurer had to concentrate only on the measurement of sails. The very early Star boats had a gaff rig, which soon gave way to a marconi, which still had a short mast and a long boom. It is generally thought that Homer Clark’s ‘Sans Souci’ introduced the new modern design which has proved very successful through the years.
Massachusetts Bay 18-footers were the early “I” class boats. According to Myron Brown, after a substantial fleet of these boats had been commissioned at Manchester by well-to-do owners belonging to the Manchester Yacht Club, the boats took on the Manchester “I” title. Although yacht racing with paid skippers and crew seemed to be the vogue in Manchester at that time, we have no record that this substitute for horse racing occurred at Sandy Bay.
Our Sandy Bay sailors were not entirely leisure time sporting sailors, so to speak. Retired Captain Frank Pierce, for instance, Star boat skipper and noted cribbage player, had sailed stone sloops up and down the coast carrying granite products from the Pigeon Cove quarries. Stories have been passed down of how those craft were loaded until the decks were awash, with only the bow, hatch and stern showing above water, leading to the moniker of “floating ledges”. Old Salts claim that there are still piles of granite cobblestones occasionally found on the bottom along the East Coast, as all that is left of overladen stone sloops from Rockport. And, of course, there is the story of the stone sloop overdue and given up for lost after the 1898 storm in which the steamer PORTLAND went down with all hands off Race Point, when, a couple days late, she made her port: “Mighty big blow”, said her skipper.
As far as a club house is concerned, Hosea Pierce says that Yacht Club members kept their boats year around in the corner of the harbor where the breakwater meets the end of Bearskin Neck, and behind “Gum Drop” or “Haystack” rock. He says a wooden staircase went down to the water’s edge at the granite wall. Another legend says that the “United Nations” house at the end of Bearskin Neck was possibly the first Club House. In light of the story of the wooden stairs, this might be possible. The Historical Marker says it was a survey site for the outer breakwater. Although photographs prove that it existed by 1910, June York, 92 years of age, says she doubts it was a club house for the yacht club. We shall see later that 1931 was the critical year concerning our present club house.
Our Certificate of Incorporation is dated in 1930. Old-timers remember that the club was “re-organized” in 1931 and went into the business of a new clubhouse with a mortgage which was largely underwritten by Lindley Dean and paid off in two years by club members. The spring after the reorganization the first race was held in March, to Thacher’s and back. The wind freshened so that skippers were reluctant to jibe, and one boat went skidding ashore at Pigeon Cove.A lighter side of the history of our clubhouse refers to what some of the sailors did all winter, every winter, after the building had been constructed in 1931. From that time on a devoted group of members played cribbage there until 1961, when Steward Arthur Swanson retired and the building was shut down to save fuel. After that they continued their cribbage competition in Hosea Pierce’s basement on Atlantic Avenue for the next five years.And with rugged names like Hosea Pierce, Musty Somers, Fooey Davis, Polo Cooney, Spooksy Grover, Fuzzy Hawley, Dyke Brown, and Duffy Blatchford on the roster, how could this yacht club fail to succeed?
Leadership of the club, again, has not been too clearly spelled out in the records. Myron Brown tells us that our first Commodore, Marion Cooney, elected in 1931, was a great promoter of boating safety. The “pun’kin seed” boats, such as the Fish and the Bird classes, supposedly stable, with a centerboard for adaptability to the shallows of the Annisquam River, for instance, and sailed at Rockport in 1930, he considered to be unsafe for our conditions on the open Atlantic, and under his leadership members approached John Alden, the prolific yacht designer of Massachusetts Bay, to draft up two rugged and seaworthy boats especially for Cape Ann Atlantic waters. These emerged as the Sandy Bay class and the Pilot class. It is said that when Bent Story was sailing his new “Sandy Bay” from the Marblehead boatyard to Rockport, by happenstance he was overtaken by John Alden in one of his schooners. After sailing a circle around the slower Story, Alden was heard to comment, “I guess I should have made the mast three feet longer”.
Commodore Cooney urged that every boat be entered in every race. If an owner or a skipper had to be absent, a substitute was found to bring the boat to the starting line, which was always off Bearskin Neck. During the race, the mooring area was empty of boats. And during Marblehead Race Week, the harbor was empty for the entire week, with the “fleet” all in Marblehead for the “big” regatta of the summer.
By 1935 we know that the Sandy Bay Yacht Club had been formalized, with incorporation in 1930, Constitution and Bylaws and an energetic year of building and putting out floats etc. in 1931, and a lease taken out for the property where the Club still is today. In fact, in 1931 a daily log was kept for the entire year, with details of the rapid development of the facilities, the weather, and many seaside events, as can be read in excerpts printed in the body of this book. From 1935 onward, our Club was an organized, recognized yacht club with its own clubhouse and floats.
By 1940 we know from the records that there were 38 registered boat owners. In 1941 Rockport fishermen and yachtsmen formed a local United States Coast Guard Auxiliary. In 1976 a Boat Parade was organized in honor of the 200th anniversary of our United States of America.
But the story of the more recent years is best told through the many illustrations, lists, and descriptions of One Design boats that have made up our “fleets” over the past half century. Many Sandy Bay Yacht Clubbers will remember the names, the boats, the scenes. And they will find so much of what they know firmly rooted in the past that other photographs record. They will see the usable harbor grow and many buildings around it change; marconi replaces gaff; hull shapes change to enhance speed; even the “correct” racing attire is different. This compilation is to please you, to interest you, to inform you – and to leave a record for those in 2035 to see us and our forebears.
Serving the Community: Youth Sailing Virginia at Fort Monroe
Youth Sailing Virginia at Fort Monroe
By Airwaves writer Rachel Bennung
In the fall of 2013 a youth sailing facility at Fort Monroe was just a dream. But less then a year later that dream started to become a reality. Now flash forward to the present Youth Sailing Virginia is a fully functioning organization, and recently just held the 2016 MASSA Fall Fleet Gold Championships for high school sailing. Youth Sailing Virginia (YSV), Inc. is a 501(c) 3 non-profit organization, whose mission is to develop a vibrant Youth Sailing Program that serves the greater Hampton Roads area and involves a broad spectrum of the community in both support and participation.
Board Member Gary Bodie was the one who presented the idea for a new youth sailing facility at Fort Monroe to a group of coaches, parents, and members of the sailing community back in 2013. The hope was to create a practice and regatta venue for the area’s high school sailing teams. After his initial presentation the buzz of this sailing center grew and started to become a reality. Kevin Eley, a board member, was recruited to head the organization which became known as Youth Sailing Virginia, Inc. A practice site was created at the historic Fort Monroe in Mill Creek with the support of Glen Oder, Executive Director of the Fort Monroe Authority.
With repaired floating docks and only seven old FJ’s at the time, Allen Kilogore coach of the Kecoughtan and Phoebus High School teams began practicing in March 2014. Then in May 2014 YSV was able to purchase 18 FJ’s from Dartmouth College giving them the ability to host regattas. In August 2014, a larger floating dock was donated, and volunteers held to rebuild to accommodate YSV’s new fleet of FJ’s. With this new fleet it gave YSV the ability to not only host regattas, but give more schools a practice site, including; Hampton High School, Kecoughtan High School, Phoebus High School, and Hampton Roads Academy. In October 2014 YSV held their first scrimmage regatta for 14 teams in the Virginia Interscholastic Sailing Association.
Currently, YSV is a practice site for the four schools mentioned above, this includes middle school JV sailors. YSV has also hosted training camps for college teams. The sailing center is operational from March to November. They typically hold 3-4 regattas in the spring and fall seasons. Most recently, YSV hosted the MASSA Gold Fall Fleet Racing Championship.
On the weekend of October 17-18th, 2016, eighteen teams throughout the MASSA district competed at YSV for the MASSA Gold Championship. On Saturday the sailors were greeted with light and shifty winds, ranging from 4-10 mph. They were able to complete 8 races in each division. On Sunday, the winds were light again ranging from 0-8 mph. With some postponements throughout the day they were able to get two races in each division for a total of 10 races for the regatta. Ranney School from New Jersey placed first, followed by Severn School in second, and Christchurch School in third. Ranney School, Severn School, Christchurch School, Christian Brothers Academy, Norfolk Collegiate School, and Broadneck School qualified to compete at the ISSA Atlantic Coast Championship in Rochester New York on November 11-12th.
All the teams that attended the MASSA Gold Championship had an enjoyable time at Youth Sailing Virginia at Fort Monroe. Teams were very impressed with the race site, race committee, and volunteers. RJ Bouchard the Varsity Sailing Coach of Nichols Sailing team said, “Mill Creek is the perfect venue for high school sailing. The body of water is entirely enclosed by land with few tall structures, allowing for flat water and steady breeze. The venue is right next to the Chesapeake Bay, not far from the ocean, allowing for an early sea breeze to develop. There seem to be no pleasure craft on Mill Creek, minimizing the boat wake that might disrupt the racing. As a long-time college and high school coach I could not have been more impressed by how perfect this body of water is for dinghy racing.” Clay Johnson the coach of the Ranney High School team said, “What made the whole weekend even more enjoyable was the level of enthusiasm and efficiency coming from the spectacular volunteer force. All on-shore logistics were organized and thought out. Gary Bodie and Kevin Eley ran an efficient, well-run event that left all teams happy they made the trek to Virginia for the weekend.”
YSV has a great community that is in full support of the sailing center. Coming in the summer of 2017 YSV plans to run learn to sail summer camps in partnership with the YMCA and Hampton City Parks and Recreation. They also plan on introducing the US Sailing REACH program. This sailing center not only is providing a great venue for high school sailing, but giving back to the community in Hampton, Virginia. Learn more and how you can help support Youth Sailing Virginia at http://youthsailingva.org.
Not a Lot of Time: Get The Most Out of Your Workout
By Airwaves writer Rachel Bennung
The biggest excuse for people not working out is lack of time. However, if you want to maximize your sailing performance you need to make the time! Some days we are just running short, but we still want to get that workout in. So how do you maximize your workout when you only have 20-30 minutes to spare?
Time can be tight some days, but if we want to better our sailing performance we still need to get our workout in. Here are four tips to help you get the most out of your short workout.
- High Intensity Interval Training
High Intensity Interval Training is a great type of cardio for sailing. Not only that, but its very effective if you only have a short amount of time to workout. You can make these workouts 10-30 minutes long, making this type of workout perfect when you are short on time. In this type of workout you give 100% effort for the exercises, then follow that with a short sometimes active recovery period. This type of workout is great for making your short time effective to help improve your sailing performance.
- Have a Plan
You always want to go into a workout knowing what you are doing. However, its even more important to have a plan when you only have a small amount of time to workout. Make sure you look at your week in advance and plan out your workouts. Writing down your workout before hand will save you time, and you will be able to get the most out of the workout. Being prepared is the most important step to your success in anything!
- Bodyweight exercises or only using one implement
When you only have a small amount of time to workout you don’t want to make it complicated. So the best form of this would be just to do bodyweight exercises or just use one implement in your workout such as a kettlebell. When you are jumping around from a kettlebell to dumbbells to a medicine ball it makes your workout longer losing the time you have actually working out. Make it simple when you have little time and make that workout effective to better your sailing performance.
- Limit rest periods
Remember you only have 20-30 minutes to get that workout in, so to make this effective you want to limit your rest periods. Get the most out of your workout and push yourself. This is going to help maximize your performance on the water. Instead of 1 minute or more of rest, stick to 30 seconds or less. This will ensure you will get the most out of the short time you have to get that workout in.
Now check out below a 30 minute workout to improve your sailing performance when you are short on time. Then check out the moves in the video below.
30 minute Strength Endurance Workout
–Warm up with Dynamic Stretching (5 minutes)
Core Activation:
- Plank Jacks (30 secs)
- Reverse Lunge w/ Forward Kick (30 secs each side)
- Side Plank with Leg Lift (30 secs each side)
- Squat Jumps (30 secs)
Repeat 2 times (6 minutes)
Workout:
- V-Ups (60 seconds)
- Push Ups (30 seconds)
- Squat w/ Standing Crunch (60 seconds)
- Ski Abs (30 seconds)
- Forward Kick with Side Lunge (30 seconds each side)
- High Knees (30 seconds)
- Full Sit Up (60 seconds)
- Burpees (30 seconds)
Repeat 2 times with 30 secs rest between sets (12 minutes)
-Cool Down with Foam Rolling and Static Stretching (5-7 minutes)
Fitting a workout into your schedule can be hard some days. However, you need to make the time, even if its only 20-30 minutes that day. Even a short workout can make a huge difference in your sailing performance. By following the tips of using high intensity interval training, having a plan, using only bodyweight exercises or just one implement, and limiting your rest periods your limited time will be effective in improving your sailing performance. Use the workout above to get started on the next day you are running short on time. Also don’t forget to check out the video below for all the moves in the workout!
For more information on fitness for sailing contact [email protected]. Also check out Sailorcise on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram for daily tips on fitness, nutrition, and sailing.
How To: Running a Successful Regatta
By Airwaves Writer Taylor Penwell
The steps to running a successful regatta
A stressful, make or break day for your yacht clubs image. The annual regatta.. A day/weekend when the club discovers if they’re competent, or simply can patch it for long enough to convince visiting participants it is, or sadly more disorganized than a crowd of Pokemon-Go players sprinting to a rare spawning.
People who play a role in the regatta,
- Directors, Head Instructors
- Coaches
- Board Members/Junior Sail Committee Members
- Club Managers
- Volunteers
- Race Officers
All of these people are vitally important for the success of any regatta. Often there are many more people and factors that come into play for larger, regional, national and international events. However this article is targeted for small and medium sized clubs.
THINGS TO DO:
Pick a good date
It is imperative that you pick a date that will work well for your club and the clubs around you. The worst thing a club can do is a pick a date when a not-so-far away club is also running a regatta. If two regattas are on the same day and less than 100 miles apart, the number of participants will drop because many will be split between the two venues. Most clubs have had specific dates for annual regattas for years, and knowingly stepping on their designated slot will bring smaller numbers to both events, friction between the other club who is now your rival for hoping more sailors show up to your event as opposed to theirs. And lastly and probably most importantly for small clubs that have to worry about their keeping their program budget in the black, conflicting dates also mean less regatta income from less registrations. At larger annual events which have a number of different classes and over a hundred competitors, this could mean suffering loss of business to the clubs bar and restaurant and also local community. A sizeable regatta bring people to towns to stay in hotels and eat in restaurants that are not affiliated with the yacht club but certainly enjoy the extra boost in customers.
So please, when picking a date, think long and hard to determine if changing your event to the same day as another nearby clubs is worth the risks.
Marketing the event
Marketing your regatta should be done through sailing registration websites, your clubs website, and Facebook pages. A good idea is to have club directors contact other clubs in your area to inform them of your event. It’s a shame when sailors don’t register for a regatta because they see no entries or small numbers. Often times the interest is there for many sailors and clubs, but people don’t want to commit unless they see that the fleet sizes make attending the event worthwhile. Having your club talk to other clubs to see if they are attending is a sign of good faith and also helps your club better prepare for the regatta.
Make a working plan
Event organizers need the cooperation of so many different people for a regatta. The most important part is making a working plan for everyone to understand what their roles will be and for them to follow them. Volunteers and
coaches need to fully know what is expected of them and how the flow of the event will go. Have a meeting and have a printed plan prior to the day of the regatta with instructions and people’s duties. This working plan can cover things such as parking instructions, unloading procedures, boat launching, registration, food and entertainment and scoring.
Have working equipment
Nothing is worse then running around like a headless chicken in the hours before the first race starts looking for marks, lines, flags, horns, and a million other things. Take time to ensure all the boats are fully operational and fueled, all the necessary flags are ready, horns and radios are working, and the marks are working with sufficient length lines. This preparation can save a lot of headache on the day of the regatta.
Have competent race committee
We have all been to events where you are constantly shaking your head at the PRO and race officials. Putting together a competent race committee takes time and energy. The best thing to do is ensure the PROs are capable of doing the job. If your club doesn’t have anyone who will agree to do the job, there is no shame in bringing in outside experienced officials. Competitors are spending time and money and are entitled to a level of professionalism from the race committee staff.
Scoring should be one of the most important aspects of the race committee. Allocate enough people and resources to the scorers so the scoring is accurate and can be posted quickly after racing is concluded.
Have attractions
Regattas are for people to compete against one another and to test their skills but they are also a major social event. Longtime friends get to see each other and catch up along with new friendships being made. A well-run regatta has great racing on the water with good attractions off the water. These attractions should be things like BBQs, bands, cocktail parties, and fun activities for children and junior sailors so everyone in the family can enjoy the regatta.
Regattas are an important pulse checker to see how a clubs sailing is doing. Sailing has seen an increase in attention in recent years with high performance boats on television and in the media. But these kinds of regattas make up a small percent of the sailing community. An to an average sailor who gets to sail for five months out of the year, their clubs annual regatta is their own America’s Cup. They deserve to have well run regattas, and ensuring this takes preparation and an understanding of how things need to be done correctly. These are just a few of the ways a yacht club can do to better prepare for a regatta so everyone can enjoy the occasion.
Club Profile: Grosse Point Yacht Club
As the GPYC celebrates its 100th year of existence, there has been even more emphasis in providing exceptional service and state-of-the-art amenities for our members and their guests in order to meet their needs and changing lifestyles.
NewsFlash: GPYC is hiring a full-time Junior Sailing Director!
You can consider the Club to be your “home away from home,” which offers something for everyone. The clubhouse grounds include a state-of-the-art swimming pool, tennis, paddle tennis, and a bowling facility. Our 268-well secured harbor, business seminar services, affiliate fitness and golf club partnerships and exceptional dining cuisine along with magnificent views of Lake St. Clair, are just some of the amenities GPYC has to offer.
There are a lot of exciting changes going on in the sailing world here at the Grosse Pointe Yacht Club! If you have been at the club recently, you may have seen one or more of the five high school sailing teams that are now sailing out of the club…in fact we are hosted the MISSA Mallory Qualifier this past weekend. There were 20 teams from all over the midwest and the top two teams moved on to the national championship for fleet racing. Our two J 70’s from last year have inspired others to start a new one design class in Detroit. Fourteen new owners have agreed to buy and race this new boat on Lake St Clair. We will have a fleet of over twenty boats sailing out of the Grosse Pointe Yacht Club for the Bayview One Design regatta which is the first weekend in June. Please swing by the club to see all the spring sailing taking place!
We also have some great enhancements to the Junior Sailing Program this summer. We will offer new courses while keeping the ones that have worked so well over the years. We will have a learn to sail program in Optimist for the younger sailors and learn to sail in the 420 for the teenagers. Adventure sailing will be a new program designed for teenagers that want to just have ur new refurbished J 22’s. Grosse Pointe Yacht Club should be proud to have the best in sailors and coaches and we will work hard to stand out at all our local regattas. The last week in July will be exciting with our two day regatta follow by a US Sailing Junior Olympics at our club July 29/30 and 31st.
I am happy to announce that we have hired Eliza Schuett to run our race team this summer. While our primary focus will be on the local events I have tasked Eliza with coordinating and executing a plan to inspire and teach our young sailors to take their sailing skills to the next level whether it be a veteran racer, or a child who has just starting racing but has the passion for more.
NewsFlash: GPYC is hiring a full-time Junior Sailing Director!
We are in the final stages of finalizing our new travel policy which thanks to the support of the Yachtsman Fund will offer a generous coaching fee reimbursement for out of town regattas that it do not make financial/logistical sense for the club to send one of our coaches to. In the meantime, If your son or daughter wishes to race in an out of town regatta, please call me ASAP so that I can help facilitate options for coaching.
Club Profile: Tred Avon Yacht Club
The Tred Avon Yacht Club Junior Sailing Program has always been an active and vibrant aspect of TAYC. While maintaining emphasis on sportsmanship, safety, and the joys of sailing, the junior program mission is to teach all levels of the sport to revive the skills and knowledge once taught in successful programs that focused on a quality youth sailing experience. Please review the program scope and sequence and course offerings for more details. The program is open to juniors, ages 6 and up, and membership at TAYC is not required. Need-based scholarships are available and inquiries are strongly encouraged.
NewsFlash: Tred Avon Yacht Club is Hiring: Junior Sailing Program Director
A Brief History of The Tred Avon Yacht Club
In June of 1931 a small group of Oxford citizens established a bathing and sporting club on The Strand just above the Oxford Ferry dock. They named it the Kap Dun Club which comes from an old English spelling of Town Point (or Cape). As the sea nettles moved in for the summer, the sporting activity quickly focused on yacht racing and the club held its first races for three boats on a Sunday in late June. The club name was changed to the Kap Dun Yacht Club. The fleet grew each week and by Labor Day of that year, the club organized a regatta with races for Knockabouts, Barnegat sneakboxes, Star boats, powered workboats, row boats, and a Free-for-All class including both square and sharp ended Log Canoes. The club also hosted a long distance race to Thimble Shoals for cruising boats. Jerry Valliant was elected Commodore and the club burgee was designed with a large blue “K” on a white background. There was an active social schedule with dinners and dances during the summer.
In January 1932 the membership voted to change the name of the club to the Tred Avon Yacht Club. A “reverse” burgee was adopted with a blue background and a white “Y” laid sideways with the points of the “Y” where the “K” had been. The same clubhouse was used but a proper flagpole was erected. By-laws were written specifying a variety of membership categories including women and juniors. The racing program flourished with weekly races and a July 4th regatta for Stars, Log Canoes, 16’ and 20’ classes and two Free-for-All classes. Membership increased to 89.
Throughout the 1930s the club grew and refined its racing. In 1934 the annual regatta was combined with that of the Chesapeake Bay Yacht Club and called the Oxford Regatta. Prominent trophies in that regatta included the Sir Thomas Lipton trophy and the Arthur J. Grymes trophy for Stars. New and local classes appeared on the scene including the Scrappy Cat designed and built by Ralph Wiley and the Comet designed by Lowndes Johnson. Many improvements in facilities were made over these years including a float and dock. But by the late 1930s there was a strong desire to build a dedicated yacht club for both improved boating and social activities. During the years that Dr. William Hammond was Commodore, 1938-9, the club leased Town Point from the town of Oxford and improved the property by grading the land, building a fence and a wharf. A new clubhouse was designed by Emory Ross and built by D. Norton Taylor. A new constitution and by-laws were adopted and the club was incorporated. The membership continued to grow and was then limited to 150. Racing flourished and the TAYC was asked to host the Comet Nationals in September 1939.
In 1940 Comm. Sigurd Hersloff started the Junior Sailing program with the addition of Penguins as a club fleet. The Club made an effort to increase Junior participation. During the war years racing was progressively limited with a small regatta in 1942, no regatta in 1943 and a “war” regatta in 1944. But in August of 1945 the Oxford Regatta hosted 64 boats. During the late 40s, the club developed rapidly. Further improvements were made to the house and grounds by enlarging the kitchen, adding a grilling area, building a dinghy shed with ramp and purchasing “The Swoose” for a club launch.
During the 1950s TAYC grew rapidly. There were constant improvements to the club facilities as the membership increased. Waterfront improvements included the extension of the east dock and the addition of the float, grading and filling low land near the dinghy shed, and a play area for young children. The Star fleet made a gift of an electric hoist for the dock. A new bar room and large porch were added to the club house. Club racing was dominated by fleets of small boats—Stars, Comets, Penguins, Thistles, Indian Landing 20s, Dolphins, Oxford Sailors, and Scrappy Cats. Club Championships were started and plaques established to record the Champions. Trophies were presented on Labor Day for club racing. The Oxford Regatta continued to draw large fleets of small and cruising boats. In 1950 the Oxford Race was changed from a start in Gibson Island to a start off Annapolis because of construction of a new bridge across the Bay. Club skippers were champions in their fleets and many Bay and regional championships were held by TAYC. In 1958 the Star class held its North American championships here and had entries from all over the world. During the summers there was an active social schedule with dances held most Saturday nights. Sunday night suppers at the club were family affairs at first catered by volunteers and then by a series of club stewards. In 1958 the TAYC started hosting a Fourth of July fireworks celebration for the town of Oxford which was funded in the early years by donations from members. Afternoon bridge was strictly for the ‘ladies’ and grew into a popular activity.
In 1950 the Junior Sailing Class was formally organized with R. Hammond Gibson as the first instructor. The strict, formal classes spawned a generation of TAYC sailors who have had long successful yachting careers. The Junior Sailing Program grew over the years with many of its alumni returning to teach the next generation of juniors. Noted yachtsman Sherman Hoyt joined the club in the early 50s and ultimately donated some of his many trophies to the Junior Sailing Program at TAYC. The junior boats have evolved from the Penguin to the Laser, Optimist and 420 following the national trends. TAYC Juniors have won many CBYRA championships and many of them have gone on to national prominence.
New regattas were established in time. In 1957 a fall race from Annapolis to Oxford was held by the Naval Academy Sailing Squadron for the cruising fleet. The return race to Poplar Island was sponsored by TAYC. Past Commodore Dr. Howard Kinnamon dedicated a punch bowl trophy to the memory of Past Commodore Dr. William T. Hammond and concocted the famous Hammond punch recipe. This regatta is now held annually in mid September. In 1984 the yacht club hosted a Log Canoe regatta in late August. In memory of his father who owned the canoe Island Blossom and in order to foster Log Canoe racing, Past Commodore William H. Myers donated the trophy for this regatta, a painting of the Island Blossom sailing past TAYC. A few years later, other traditional Chesapeake Bay classes were invited to race the same weekend and this regatta has grown to become the Myers Heritage Regatta and is held late each August.
During the latter 20th century many club families transitioned from racing one designs to racing cruising yachts. The club racing program included CCA and then PHRF handicap series. Teams of club members won many Bay championships and high point trophies from CBYRA.
A significant number of members distinguished the club by bringing home trophies from Annapolis, Nassau, Newport, Halifax and Bermuda.
In 1990 the old club house was found to be unsound. The membership voted to build a new two story house. A spectacular fire was organized to take down the old club. During the sailing season of 1991, the club operated from a tent but still hosted regattas for almost 300 boats. In late 1991, the new club opened to great appreciation for the view afforded by the second story balcony. In 2001 the membership voted to replace the old west dock with floating docks in order to reduce the effect of wakes. This provided mooring for a club fleet of Ideal 18’s which were purchased for the use of members for racing, instruction and day sailing. This fleet, known as Focus on Sailing, has increased participation in sailing by members who are not yacht owners or who want to sail in one designs with other members.
What (and whose) Dinghies Are Best For College Sailing? Re-posted
Editors Note: Sail1Design exists to serve the youth, high school, collegiate, and one-design sailing communities. The observations in this letter were received, and published, in the genuine interest of what is best for the sailors who compete. While those non-sailors who support sailing (administrators, board members, coaches, umpires, etc) are important, and do good work, by FAR the most important part of what we do are the things we do for the sailors themselves, especially young ones. Our organizations should seek, without fail, to make sure they exist for that purpose.
Sail1Design stands behind our op/ed piece published earlier. To get to the main points, a shorter version is hereby republished.
We were, however, remiss in not allowing the ICSA a chance, before the fact, to take part in the conversation. We have added a question/answer section from Mitch Brindley, ICSA President. Sail1Design apologizes for that. As stated, again and again, our mission what’s best for youth and one-design sailors. We feel this is a worthy discussion. Our interview with Mitch is at the end of this piece.
Sailing evolves, like everything else. Over the years, the Intercollegiate Yacht Racing Association [ICYRA] (now, of course, known as the Intercollegiate Sailing Association [ICSA]) has stewarded college and institutional sailing, and made needed changes to stay up with, and improve the game. The National Semi-Finals/Finals format, the growth of team racing, match racing, season practice limits, etc. have all been just a few of the thoughtful changes made by a caring, dedicated, and volunteer organization.
In 2012, the ICSA made a decision to standardize and simplify the equipment used at ICSA National Championships, awarding one supplier, LaserPerformance (formerly known as Vanguard) the sole and exclusive right, for 7 years (it has been reported) to supply dinghies (c420’s, z420’s, and cFJ’s) for the double-handed national championships. This agreement dovetailed with the launch of the LaserPerformance Z420; a higher performance, upgraded and modified design of the original c420 (manufacturer claims 50 lbs lighter and 40% stiffer than the standard scv420). Better boats, standardized; in theory, not a bad idea. Given recent events at the 2016 San Diego College Sailing Nationals (it has been widely reported that the FJ fleet there had significant problems and most boats were destroyed after the event) and others, however, should this agreement be reviewed, and again scrutinized?
Quite clearly this relationship is, and was, a sponsorship agreement, one designed to bring revenue to the ICSA. Sponsorship agreements are perfectly fine, quite common, and with high-profile college athletics, they can also be quite lucrative. The ICSA has every right to solicit and accept sponsorship dollars, for the better of the sport, and most importantly, for the sailors that compete. The ICSA has numerous sponsorship agreements that do just that. In theory, this agreement with LaserPerformance (LP) could have done the same thing, and in theory, it would be a win-win: ICSA gets needed revenue to manage, support, market, and administer college sailing, and LaserPerformance gets their boats at the highest profile institutional sailing events in the world, the college sailing semi-finals and nationals.
How could this go wrong? Critics argue the following (these are well documented):
- Eliminating Venue Diversity. For one, critics immediately argued that by shutting out all other builders, schools without LP boats would, unfairly so, have no chance at hosting Nationals Semi-finals, or Finals. This is a well documented fact, please ask us for detail if you wish. What do you think?
- Less Competition = Less Quality At a Higher Price. Next, by eliminating all other builders from producing boats for the Nationals, one runs the risk of stifling competition, and removing incentive for other builders to supply and support the 420 and FJ. We asked Adam Smith. Competition is usually good for business, especially for the consumer, and tends to have the added benefit of holding costs down for the consumer. What do you think?
- Know Your Sport. Sailing is a unique sport, and one that thrives on diversity. Unlike basketball, our “playing fields” are just not alike. To explain, each venue is different, and each program has different needs, strengths, and abilities. Tech Dinghies, Larks, different versions of the FJ, Fireflies, Turbo 420’s, Z420’s etc. are chosen and used at venues, usually, for good reasons. Larks seem to fit the Mystic Lake very well, for example, just as 420’s are great for Brown, while Tech Dinghies, among other boats, make sense for MIT. Some schools benefit from square top mainsails, others not. This attention to environment should not be, in any way, discouraged by a sponsorship agreement. In that light, the mandated new 420, the “z420”, has not won universal approval as the ideal dinghy for all of college sailing, everywhere. What do you think?
Now, four years later, how has this agreement impacted college sailing? What happened at the San Diego Nationals?* Please write in and tell us. We heard that most of the fleet was destroyed after the event.
Has the sponsorship been a success? In other words, and in the bottom line, in the four years of this agreement, what has been the return to shareholders (college sailors)? What do you think?
This is also not a knock on LaserPerformance, out-of-hand. If they are clearly the best option for sailboats for college sailing, we need to know that, and we should support the agreement. It is entirely possible that the company is doing great things for college sailing, and that this is indeed, a win-win. We hope, however, that regardless, this fosters adult conversation and debate, and that, along with transparency and facts, we can do what’s best for our college sailors.
In Review, and Questions to Ask:
- How much does the ICSA benefit financially from this agreement, and has that financial commitment been faithfully met? It would be important, in fact critical, to know how much the ICSA benefits from this agreement, and how faithfully that agreement has been met by the supplier (LP).
- Is there a fee that a school can pay to host the nationals without LP Boats?
- Is LaserPerformance able to provide quality, long-lasting, competitively priced boats that serve our sport and our sailors?
- Is LaserPerformance able to support these boats with timely service, parts, and competitively priced replacement parts?
- Is the experience at San Diego’s 2016 National Championship just a one-time problem?
- What is the extent of the warranty work list on LP-supplied boats, and is it acceptable?
- Is the z420 the answer?
We welcome your thoughts and comments, positive and critical. Please post below where it says “Join the Discussion”
*According to many sources at the event, most of the brand new Flying Junior sailboats provided for the 2016 Nationals are no longer in use, and may well have been destroyed. Were you there? How were the boats? What are the facts?
INTERVIEW WITH MITCH BRINDLEY
Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to respond to your opinion piece concerning the LaserPerformance – ICSA Sponsorship. I understand your desire to create conversation about college sailing and your efforts to support the sport.
The ICSA is very appreciative of the support all of our sponsors provide college sailors. There are many companies within the marine industry who want a piece of the college sailing market; the ICSA sponsors back that desire up with cash support for College Sailing. LaserPerformance, like our other sponsors, is committed to College Sailing. Generally, our championship title sponsorship agreements carry a category exclusivity and are multiyear agreements. College Sailing depends on the monetary support of sponsorship. It should be noted that ICSA sponsorship revenue has in large part paid for the development and maintenance of Techscore, benefiting all of ICSA and ISSA.
Mitch, thanks for taking the time to chat with us, especially considering the difficulty you had traveling to Cornell this past weekend (canceled flight…etc).
S1D: In our original op-ed piece, we asked what benefits the LP Agreement provides for college sailors. Could you list them, briefly. I think many are not aware, or may not appreciate the depth, and scope of this relationship.
Mitch Brindley: The LaserPerformance sponsorship agreement provides College Sailing with the following specific benefits:
- A fleet of 18 complete and new Laser Standards and a fleet of 18 complete and new Laser Radials at no cost to the sailors.
- A LaserPerformance staff member onsite during the Singlehanded Championships to support the fleet
- Logistic support for the fleet of 36 lasers
- Marketing, PR, and Social Media support for the Singlehanded Championships with a global reach.
- Significant Annual cash sponsorship fee. Application of the sponsorship funds is at the sole discretion of the ICSA. ICSA uses these funds to provide direct support of the ICSA National Championships, as well as other expenses benefiting college sailing such as travel grants, Techscore development and maintenance, website development and maintenance, and other operational expenses.
- New in 2016, a complete set of 18 branded team race mainsails and FJ jibs.
- LP provides professional streaming video coverage with analysts and commentators for the Women’s and Team Race Championships.
- Marketing, PR, and Social Media support for the spring championships.
- Multiyear contract provides greater long-term financial security for College Sailing.
- Agreement provides an opportunity for a host to use one fleet of non-LaserPerformance/Vanguard manufactured boats at the spring championships. This would change some of LP’s obligations to the ICSA, such as payment of fee and expense of media support.
- ICSA’s relationship with LaserPerformance and their sponsorship of the Singlehanded Championships has been fundamental to ISSA’s singlehanded championships.
S1D: There may be some misconceptions about the degree to which the 2016 Nationals FJ fleet was problematic. Can you state with accuracy what some of these may have been?
Mitch Brindley: The variance in weights of the fleet of 2016 FJs used during the championships was less than 10 lbs. Outliers were excluded from the fleet.
It was discovered during the first day of the semifinals for the Sperry Women’s National Championship that some of the boats were taking on water in the tanks. The biggest source of the leaks was the cockpit plugs not properly installed through the rivets and insufficient sealant. There was some leaking through the spinnaker fittings that had been removed in San Diego to equalize the collegiate version boats and the junior racing versions. And some boats were leaking through the centerboard gasket assembly. It was my experience that some sailors and coaches were over estimating volume of water being drained. I heard sailors say, ‘We drained our boat for five minutes’, or “our tanks were full”. That wasn’t the case; 5 minutes is a long time to press an FJ bow on a floating dock. I frequently timed how long a boat was drained, boats were rarely held for more than a minute. I also measured water that was drained from tanks and it never exceeded liter. A team did receive redress for water in the tanks.
S1D: While it is a fact that most of the 2016 Nationals FJ fleet was destroyed after the event, we would like to learn, and I think it’s valuable information for our community, what LP’s response was to this.
Mitch Brindley: I don’t think anyone was more upset and frustrated by the problems than the LaserPerformance representatives at the regatta and the SDYC event officials. Throughout the events, LaserPerformance worked to solve the problem; some boats were removed from the rotation, repaired and then returned. Some boats didn’t leak. In addition to LP’s Technical Engineer on site, 2 LP repair technicians from the UK were brought over to facilitate repairs, and stayed through-out the event. Four additional people from the LP manufacturing team were brought in to address the issues. In the end it is my understanding that LP wasn’t hasn’t happy with fleet as a representative product, so they chose to have the boats destroyed.
Since San Diego, LaserPerformance manufacturing has corrected the problem and made overall improvements to their FJ. Bill Crane, LaserPerformance Chairman of the Board, has been overseeing manufacturing and significant improvements to the gasket system. The cockpit stringers have been improved to allow for more complete and tighter fit of the hull and deck, eliminating weight from the bonding material. And it created a more completely supported cockpit sole. They built a clear FJ to study the construction techniques and bonding of the hull and deck, and hulls are inspected with electronic instrumentation. Director of Institutional Programs, Adam Werblow was at the in China this summer and is very confident in the changes incorporated.
S1D: Can you discuss the new realities of Nationals hosting, from the Exec. Committees point of view? How has this changed over time, what do you now need from a host bid, and how in your view does the LP arrangement make this this challenge a more achievable responsibility?
Mitch Brindley: Over the last 8 – 10 years or so there have been some great changes and improvements in College Sailing, such as team uniforms, branded sails, live scoring with Techscore, championships with semifinals and resulting in the most competitive championship finals, combining semifinals and finals at one location, and 36-team women’s and coed Championships. There has also been an increase in competitive depth in college sailing over the last 20 years. There is no doubt that combining the semifinals and finals into one event has made for an incredibly deep, competitive, and fun championship. This desire for such a championship, with all the teams sailing their way into the finals resulted in the requirement of two fleets of 18 boats at one venue. It also created an event that is a beast to host.
Some of the expectations or needs for the championships from the host or venue are:
- Two 18 fleets of evenly matched collegiate dinghies
- Expert race management, judges, and umpires (including housing, meals, and travel expenses) all with extensive college sailing experience
- Good, reliable sailing conditions (157 races in the team race championship)
- Shore-side venue large enough for 350+ people daily
- Shore-side spectating
- Onsite vendor
- 10-15 appropriate sized powerboats for judges, umpires and media
- Sponsor fulfillment
- Media support and PR
- Sail storage and transport (4 sets of mainsails, 2 jibs)
- Available and affordable housing for teams and spectators
- Venue staff, team members or well trained and plentiful volunteers
Sponsorship revenue and entry fees are intended to cover much of the expenses of the championships.
S1D: Is there anything else you’d like to add?
Mitch Brindley: To clarify another item in your Op-Ed, move away from Chicago for 2017 had nothing to do with our current contract with LaserPerformance. University of Wisconsin found is necessary to withdraw their support for the 2017 Chicago Championships due to purchasing hindrances beyond their control with the WI state government. There planned purchase was held up by the Governor. And they didn’t think the purchase would be made in time for the championship. As a result ICSA and CYC no longer had the needed support and fleet to successfully host the championships in Chicago. CYC had one fleet of boats, junior racing version c420s. We no longer had 2 fleets of collegiate dinghies, nor did we have a collegiate host. The ICSA Championship Committee unanimously accepted a revised bid from College of Charleston (bid for 2018), and the ICSA Executive Committee and Board approved the Charleston 2017 bid.
(In our original piece we asked the question: why was the venue for the upcoming Nationals so recently changed from Chicago to Charleston. It has been reported to us that this had to do with fleet types.)





