Zach, your insights come from your own recent experiences, and you have conveyed them honestly to us, your readers. I wish you a world of success in your many endeavors
awesome post
Nice post guys, really nicely laid out with good graphics. If you can execute your plan I’ll be happy to see you out on circuit and in Miami!
Comet racing/sailing
As a kid, I had a Comet 3778 red sails, Highland Lakes, N.J. Now 63 yoa retired in Florida, I would like to once again enjoy sailing a Comet. I suggest making a crew optional for us heavy set guys. It was always hard to find a crew for Sunday morning races. Good luck!
Playbook for Starting Your Olympic Campaign
By Airwaves Writer Zach Brown
Within the community of sailing there exists a wealth of knowledge on the subject of running an Olympic campaign, but it is difficult to access that information and formulate a plan that fits an individual’s unique situation. The goal of this article is to supply sailors with the tools they need to plan a campaign and get it started.
An Olympic campaign is truly a war of attrition. Bermuda’s 2012 Olympic 49er crew Zander Kirkland smartly stated that a doublehanded campaign can be boiled down to four components: sailing performance, money, team dynamic, and injuries. A strong construction of all four pillars delivers a successful campaign, but a weakness in one pillar affects the integrity of the entire structure. For example, it is difficult to train and compete if there isn’t any money. Or, it is difficult to get the results if there isn’t a positive team dynamic. When planning a campaign, it is important to start with these four pillars and sketch out how to build and connect each of them.
Choose Your Boat
An individual needs to have the proper body size for the boat, the boat must have security in the Olympics, and the boat needs to be fun to sail. Body weight and height are critical to performance in sailing. A 160 pound male sailor should consider Kiteboarding, crewing a 470, skippering a 49er, or sailing the Nacra 17. A 130 pound female should not campaign a Radial, but rather consider skippering a 470, skippering a 49er FX, or sailing the Nacra 17.
It is paramount to select a boat that maintains a high level of security as a continuing Olympic class boat. The safety of a boat’s existence in the Olympics over the next few quadrenniums is not a factor to dismiss when considerable time and money are on the line. There are obvious choices like the Laser and Laser Radial that easily meet the strict qualifications imposed by ISAF. The 470 was rumored to get the boot for the 2016 Olympics, but strong support from the Asian and European delegates maintained the boat’s Olympic status. A considerable amount of research should be put into the security of an Olympic class boat when selecting the perfect boat for an individual’s campaign.
An obvious feature that is constantly overlooked by sailors considering an Olympic campaign is fun. If a boat is not fun to sail and race, then don’t campaign the boat. The average Olympic sailor spends more than 175 days of the year on the water. Select a challenging boat that is exciting to practice and race for 50% of the year.
Choose Your Partner
Selecting the best teammate for an Olympic campaign is almost as important as picking a husband or wife because a team lives, sails, travels, organizes, and fundraises together. Teammates should not have to compromise on every detail of the campaign in order to work together. A good teammate does not have to be a best friend, but that person should at the least be a friend in the making. When the race is on the line, the optimal teammate is one that empowers the skipper or crew to be their best.
Essential skills of an ideal teammate include sailing ability, organizational aptitude, marketing talent, fitness inclination, dedication, and perseverance. Sailing talent alone will not get a campaign to the Olympics. The work load between teammates needs to be balanced so that it truly feels like a team. Looking back to the four pillars of a campaign, if the team dynamic is compromised, then performance will be negatively impacted.
Get in Contact
One of the first orders of business for a budding Olympic campaign is to reach out to the US Sailing Olympic director and staff. Making contact with these individuals is critical to success because they control many factors including coaching, funding, resources, and much more. The US Sailing Team staff has information on team clinics, schedules, boat setup tricks, and boat tuning numbers.
The National and North American class representatives are resources of knowledge that will help new class members find equipment to buy, local teams to contact, and domestic and international regatta schedules. Do not be afraid to reach out to current Olympic campaigners for advice and questions because they have all gone through the same start-up process.
Create a Business Plan
Every Olympic campaign needs a business plan. Olympic sailors are the CEOs of their own non-profit companies so it is important to treat the campaign like a business. Create short and long-term goals that are obtainable and outline a roadmap to get from step one to the final step on the podium at the Games. Do not be fooled into dismissing the skills learned in school. Take speech courses, pay attention in accounting classes, master excel, and own PowerPoint presentations.
Budget
One of the more difficult duties of an Olympic campaign is to recognize each line item expense that will occur and assign an accurate estimate. Taking an accounting class and creating a personal budget are good places to start. Boat and equipment expenses, sailing gear, vehicle and fuel, flights, ferries and tolls, housing, food, regatta fees, fitness, health insurance, and fundraising costs are relevant macro line items. The next step in budgeting is to breakdown the macro components into manageable cost items. Take boat equipment and expenses for example. When purchasing a new boat the following must be considered: cost of boat, foreign exchange price, boat accessories like covers and dolly, customs agent fees, shipping, customized lines, shackles, and sails.
Fundraise
Money is a critical piece to every Olympic campaign, hence its recognition as being one of the four pillars of a campaign. Simply put, a sailing campaign cannot get started without some considerable initial investments like a boat. Money is needed to have the best equipment so that a team is spending most its time on the water training instead of on land fixing an old boat. Money is needed to travel to regattas in Europe and to race against large talented fleets. And, money is needed to hire good coaches to jump a team to the next level.
Second to sailing talent, fundraising might be the most important skill required in an Olympic campaign. The best way to approach the overwhelming number on the bottom line of a budget is to sketch out channels of potential income and rank them in order of value. Income channels include family, close friends, fellow alumni of schools and universities, rotary or non-profit organizations, private coaching, big boat programs, etc. Another important step for fundraising is to set up an account with a local sailing organization that has a 501.C.3 to receive tax deductible donations. It is necessary to develop marketing and communication skills in order to sell the campaign and attract sponsors and donors.
International Comparisons
Many of the ideas presented above are relevant for all Olympic campaigns across every country. Stu McNay, a two time Olympian weighs on the differences between the US playbook and the British system: “The US playbook asks a lot on the budget and management side from its athletes while other countries not so much.&nb
sp; [Other countries like England and Australia] often have logistical coordinators for all travel arrangements and accommodation. Also, they manage budgets and raise funds.” The US system requires its sailors to perform two roles as a campaign manager and athlete while most other countries ask their sailors to just be an athlete. McNay added that maturity and the ability to make decisions are important no matter which system an Olympic campaign fits under.
One consideration that should not be overlooked: the American Olympic sailing program develops relevant management and logistical skills that are valuable for most jobs. Being just an athlete is a lot easier than being both an athlete and a CEO of a non-profit organization. Reentering the workforce after an Olympic campaign is difficult, but after marketing an Olympic campaign for years, the task of selling one’s skills and story to an employer should be easy.
The US Olympic campaign is quite the job description. The question of whether or not the management, budgeting, and logistical functions of a US campaign inhibit sailors from reaching their full potential as an athlete is another story for another time.
Good Luck
Campaigning for the Olympics in sailing is an incredibly difficult task. Teams commit three, six, ten, or even twenty years to possibly go to the Games and win a medal. There is no guarantee. The lifestyle is difficult because life is all packed up in one big suitcase, it is difficult to be in one location for an extended period of time, it is difficult to maintain a relationship, and it difficult to continue a career during a campaign or reenter the workforce after one. Those who are or will be committed to an Olympic campaign, I salute you!
STEPHANIE ROBLE AND MAGGIE SHEA, DUAL US MATCH RACING CHAMPIONS – SEPTEMBER’S SAIL1DESIGNERS OF THE MONTH
By: Martha Pitt
A few weekends ago, two championships were held on back-to-back weekends and on opposite coasts – the US Women’s Match Racing Championship was sailed out in San Francisco Bay, CA and the following weekend the US Match Racing Championship took place in Marblehead, MA – and for the first time in history, two women can call themselves dual champions of the two events! Stephanie Roble and Maggie Shea, two women that have been match racing full time for the past few years, sailed on the winning boats in both events, proving their expertise and skills in match racing.
Stephanie Roble, from East Troy, WI has been sailing since she was 5 years old at Lake Beulah YC. A graduate from Old Dominion University, Roble was a two-time All-American Women’s Skipper before graduating in 2011. She got into match racing while at ODU, and began to think about an Olympic campaign to compete in the 2012 Olympics. Skippering many events, but also getting on the race course as a crew, Roble has devoted much of the past few years to becoming the skilled match racer that she is today. Her love for team racing got her hooked on match racing as a more accessible discipline, and since she has fallen in love with the intense one-on-one format. She enjoys it most because “you are required to think on your toes on all parts of the course. Success depends on precise communication, boat handling and rules strategy.”
Often sailing alongside Roble over the past few years has been Maggie Shea of Wilmette, IL. Shea grew up sailing with her family on their boat Windancer, and learned to race dinghies at the Chicago Yacht Club starting at the age of 12. Shea sailed against Roble for four years in college, sailing for Connecticut College where she was a Women’s All-American Honorable Mention honoree. She began match racing in 2010 when she became an intern at the Chicago Match Race Center, where she and Roble have been working regularly for the past year, amidst their sailing endeavors. Shea enjoys the intensity level of match racing, where you either win or you lose. The complex tactics rely on solid execution, good boat handling, and fast boat speed in whatever kind of boat you end up sailing, which is part of the appeal for Shea – “I appreciate how many different boats I’ve had the chance to sail while match racing.”
For the past three years, Roble and Shea have been sailing together, and joined up with Darby Smith of Marblehead, MA in 2011 to do an Olympic campaign for the women’s match racing spot in the 2012 Games. After lots of training and many great results, the team ultimately fell to world-class racer Anna Tunnicliffe in the semi-finals of the trials, but only saw the positives of their whole campaign experience and didn’t stop there! Roble and Shea have continued to represent the Chicago Match Race Center in numerous events, sailing with a range of different sailors and in different boats, and have embraced every moment.
In the first of the two national championships, Shea and Roble joined up with former competitors Genny Tulloch and Jen Chamberlain to sail the J22s out in San Francisco Bay. Though the four had never sailed together before, their combined experience matched with great chemistry put them well ahead of any of their competition. “The Bay lived up to its breezy reputation,” said Shea, “and our pre-start boat handling gave us an edge on the competition; we started all but two races in a controlling position.” The team went 21-0 during the four day event, and came away as the 2012 US Women’s Match Racing Champions!
Competition seemed much more fierce and the stakes higher at the US Match Racing Championship the following weekend in Marblehead, MA. This time Roble and Shea teamed up with skipper Taylor Canfield of St. Thomas, USVI and Janel Zarkowsky of Annapolis, MD to take on what some consider one of the toughest pools in event history. Canfield, coming off two 2nd place finishes at this event the previous two years, was fired up to finally take the win. “There was an excellent range of sailors that are highly respected in the match racing world,” commented Roble, including powerhouses Dave Dellenbaugh and Dave Perry, two of the most experienced match racers in the US. The girls have learned a tremendous amount from both Taylor and “the Daves” over the years, to be sailing with and against them in this event was an honor. “We are all very competitive,” said Roble, when asked about the dynamic on the boat, “so there were some heated moments but we managed to overcome them and sail some really great races.” And that they did! In an intense final round, the team went up 2-0 against Dellenbaugh in the first two races, only to fall in the following two to take the series into the fifth and final race. Not willing to let this one slip away, Canfield, Roble, Shea, and Zarkowsky worked hard to take control during the pre-start and were able to lead all the way around the course to the finish for the victory.
While the significance of these two back-to-back victories is indeed great, they are just two events on the girls’ busy schedules, which remain packed with match racing, team racing, and fleet racing alike for the reminder of the fall and into the winter season. For both Shea and Roble, it’s all about enhancing their experiences; “I am enjoying exploring different crewing positions and boats,” says Shea, “and hope to do as much racing as possible.” For Roble, “I am trying to do as much crewing as possible because I learned to match race and sail keelboats as a skipper. Being a crew (especially tactician) provides a new view on racing. For the future, I am trying to jump on as many sailing opportunities as possible, whether its driving, crewing, match racing, team racing, fleet racing, or coaching. I just love sailing and want my future to be filled with it!”
Congratulations to Maggie Shea and Stephanie Roble, along with their fellow champions Taylor Canfield, Janel Zarkowsky, Genny Tulloch, and Jen Chamberlain for winning the 2012 US Match Racing titles!
used 420 charters
Hi Bob, Do you have a used 420 you would like to sell? Thanks, Sarah Reynolds
Response From LaserPerformance
LaserPerformance would like to take this opportunity to add to Mitch Brindley’s response to Franny’s unfortunate and misleading letter. LaserPerformance has been a supporter and partner of Collegiate racing since 1976. The new contract extends and expands the sponsorship of the ICSA programs. LaserPerformance has nothing to hide and should the ICSA decide that the contract is not in the best interest of its members, we would be happy to still continue our support for Collegiate sailing by providing the 36 Laser or Laser Radials to the ICSA at our own expense. LaserPerformance support of college sailing goes well beyond our contractual obligations. We have and we will continue to support college sailing directly and indirectly by, for instance dedicating exclusive and full time staff to college sailing, outstanding operations support as well as focusing our marketing resources on the growth of college sailing. This has a significant cost attached for LaserPerformance, one that is equal to millions of dollars over the 7 years of the contract. LaserPerformance has also committed itself to college sailing by investing heavily in the next generation of the 420 as reported on Sail 1 Design’s Airwaves. This new boat has been designed after consultation with collegiate sailors, coaches (including Zack Leonard, Bill Healey, Bill Ward, Adam Werblow, Greg Wilkinson, David Thompson, Mitch Brindley and many more), boat designers led by Naval Architect Peter Levesque and the latest sailing trends in both design and equipment. As a result our new 420 addresses issues such as the ability to adjust and tune the rig and sails, maneuverability, crew weight, performance, durability and safety. Early results from our plant in Portsmouth, RI indicate we will be able to reduce the overall weight of the boat significantly more than previously reported by Adam Werblow on Airwaves. Other impressive results indicate that we should be able to maintain our current base price while offering a product that is far superior to anything on the market today. Stay tuned for announcements in regard to our demonstration program and schedule that begins before the end of the 2012 Fall Sailing Season. -LaserPerformance North America
I am disappointed
I cannot imagine what went into making this decision, and would never try. I’m sure that the leadership of ICSA had good intentions, but it is still a problem. This decision effectively means that no championship will be held on the west coast. Here we all sail FJ’s. Every single school sails the same boat so that we can move boats from site to site. In order for a school to get the opportunity to host a championship they must do one of three things: A) be rich enough to own two fleets of boats, so that leaves Stanford and USC, everyone else, sorry about your luck. No more races in Irvine, no racing in the Columbia River Gorge, no racing in Seattle. B) simply decide to only race on the East Coast because they cannot compete in FJ’s. or C) Convince every school in PCIYRA and NWICSA to spend money that almost none of them have and dump hundreds of FJ’s onto a non-existant market and buy 420’s. As for MCSA? Forget it. I know that the East Coast doesn’t go to sail in Chicago, Madison, Ann Arbor much, but those teams are going to be terribly hard pressed to go out and spend tens of thousands to buy boats in the hopes of getting a fleet. I have no idea how it will happen. Part of Collegiate Sailing has ALWAYS been the challenge of sailing new boats and accommodating quickly. MIT sailed Larks, Tufts modified them for their Mystic Lake, Michigan sailed 470’s and Navy had everyboatevermadebyanyone. Just as much as having to sail in Charleston’s current today, handle the insane windshifts at Harvard next week, and avoid powerboats at UCI the following week is part of the game, so is dealing with the fact that boats aren’t all the same (and neither btw are NHL rinks). Finally, from this perspective, how would feel if you did play Basketball, in say Los Angeles, and suddenly the NBA commissioner said “Hey Lakers, we are going to change the ball, but there is no way on earth you can use it except when you come and play the Celtics”? I don’t ascribe bad intent to the ICSA executive committee, but it feels from the West Coast that the powers that be just tightened their grip on the game again.
Agree to Disagree
In regards to the equipment used at the college level of sailing I agree with your statement, “the equipment should not be up for interpretation. Top-flight athletic competition should be about the athletes involved.” However, I strongly disagree with your basketball analogy about the height of the rim. A better analogy would be the size, weight and composition of the ball itself. In basketball there are several manufacturers of basketballs. The balls are manufactured to a standard similar to the way one design boats are made. Many professional and collegiate sports sign contracts to use one brand of ball however, that is not a like comparison for two reasons. First, the manufactures of basketballs i.e. Spalding, Wilson and Nike are diverse enough that an exclusive contract is not going to be make or break. Second, Exclusive contracts are all about money and branding. What we need right now in the sailing community is healthy competition. What we don’t need is a bully like LP getting exclusive contracts, it won’t be good for the sport in the long run. I don’t see the problem with using strictly one design boats. Competition is a healthy thing. It keeps prices down and quality up. Given all the controversy surrounding LP and other companies owned by Farzad Rastegar I can’t see how this agreement can have a positive outcome.
Jacksonville University Sailing Team – A Model for a Building Team
By Airwaves Writer Martha Pitt
Across the country, high school and youth sailing is continuing to grow, and subsequently the number of junior sailors looking to sail at the college level – many have their eyes on teams at the top of the college rankings. As it stands now, with few exceptions, the same collegiate teams have held those top spots for years, teams on which talented and dedicated sailors often find themselves “riding the bench” for years. Smaller teams are now trying to tap into that up-and-coming talent by creating programs that will draw in some of those top junior sailors who will be able to compete at that high level their whole college career and help the team grow.
The Jacksonville University Sailing Team is one such team that is looking for talented young sailors to help it grow! Now recognized as a varsity sport at its institution, the JU team is in a great position to become a strong contender in its conference and beyond. With new support from the athletic department, the team has been able to revamp its program and hire a full time coach. One of the greatest challenges for small collegiate sailing teams looking to grow and break into that top competitive group of collegiate powerhouses is funding and support. While historically, many club teams have been able to compete at the same level as varsity teams, the discrepancy between the two is certainly growing, and teams that are looking to reach that next level are finding that having varsity status within their institutions can make all the difference.
The Jacksonville University Sailing Team has spent the last ten years as a club team; prior to this fall the team was a small club sport that basically trained people how to sail in house. There was little coaching available, the team had a limited practice schedule, and it was funded solely by member dues. But after many years of hard work by the sailing team’s academic advisor Dr. Steven Davis – including rallying support from the local sailing community, creating a fundraising organization, writing feasibility reports, strategic plans, and budgets, and putting some serious pressure on the administration – the sailing team is ready to take the next step as a varsity program.
The team is in the Southeastern Atlantic Intercollegiate Sailing Association (SAISA), along with strong teams like College of Charleston, University of South Florida, and Eckerd College. The team is hoping that this move will help them get the coaching and support to compete with these conference powerhouses and become a contender on the national circuit.
One of the big initiatives in turning this team from just a club team to a varsity team was the hiring of a year-round, full time coach. After a solid search, they found Jon Faudree to take on the challenge and get the team on its feet! Jon has spent years working in the sailing industry, most recently running the sailing program at Rochester Yacht Club in up-state New York. Jon is thrilled to take on such a great role, and hope that he can find some sailors that share his enthusiasm for the growth of what will soon become a very strong collegiate team! Read some comments from Head Coach Jon Faudree below: “During my 20 year career I have been involved in coaching at nearly every level of sailing from Youth, High School, College to One-Design Keelboats and Offshore Fleets, I have never come across a program like this that was just starting out. This school and the local sailing community want a successful sailing team and they have invested a lot of time and money into making this happen. JU’s passion for building a team is infectious and I am thrilled to be involved. “At JU, sailors will have the ability to become immediate impact players and have the opportunity to make a name for themselves by helping to grow a team from the beginning. Right now the team is small and the school’s eight (8) 420’s are dolly launched off the beach. By next fall we will have a new fleet of 420’s and floating docks, and the school, along with the team’s supporters are very serious about building a world class sailing center in the very near future. My five year goal is to create a ‘St. Mary’s of the south’ by completing a ‘green’ sailing center with a large fleet of boats that would provide access to the water for all students and the community in the summer. “JU is a small private university with a fascinating mix of majors, and class sizes that reflect individual attention. Its 14-to-1 average student-to-professor ratio ensures that students are known by name and not just a number. JU’s beautiful 190 acre campus borders a half mile of St. Johns River front property, directly across from downtown Jacksonville.” |
Jenna Spangler has been a member of the JU Sailing Team for the past two years, and the switch to varsity status means a tremendous amount for her and her fellow teammates. “As a club sport we didn’t have the funds nor the student involvement to excel. Our new varsity status has given us both of these things. Jon has helped us to retain a good group of new sailors in which to build and grow our sailing program on.” Having a coach has made the greatest difference to Jenna, who has seen huge changes in just the past six weeks – “Having Jon available to discuss and dissect every little move out on the water is really amazing. He is full of 420 experience and his knowledge and love of sailing is quite something. Jon is extremely patient when showing us new techniques and really helps you to feel comfortable in a boat.”
With college sailing growing across the country, there are many teams out there probably looking to do the same that could learn some things from JU efforts. For more information on the steps that the JU Sailing Team took to become a varsity program, feel free to contact Head Coach Jon Faudree at jfaudre@ju.edu. You may also check out the Sailing Team website – www.ju.edu/sailing.
For more information on Jacksonville University, please see: http://www.ju.edu/aboutju/Pages/default.aspx
Controversy in the ICSA: The Future of The “College Sailing Dinghy”
……under scrutiny
Last month, Airwaves writer Zach Brown published an article on “Meet The New Collegiate 420.” This article presented information on LaserPerformance’s new 420 design made specifically for college sailing, with the overall design focus of making the boat perform better, adding excitement and fun, and to be even more durable.
At the time of publication we did not intend to say that this boat was the official college sailing dinghy by any means, but just another option in a growing array of choices for college sailing programs. After receiving some constructive criticism for how our article might have been misleading, the latest news regarding college sailing dinghies makes us understand this criticism much better. And since then, we have posted articles on the Firefly, and other collegiate dinghies.
Last week, the ICSA posted a note on their Facebook page, announcing a new sponsorship agreement with LaserPerformance. This note was not very detailed, but soon after the posting, several “open letter” emails appeared on the ICSA mailing list, decrying this new sponsorship agreement. The text of these “open letters” can be found here, one from Mr. Fran Charles, MIT Sailing Director, and Tufts Head Coach Ken Legler. It is best for our readers to judge these arguments on their own, rather than us comment on them. The bottom line is that these letters quite clearly expressed significant disappointment at the decision of the ICSA to enter into an agreement with a vendor (LaserPerformance) that requires the hosts of national championship events, the semi-finals and finals included, to be sailed in LaserPerformance boats (they make 420s & FJ’s).
In full disclosure, it is important to note that LaserPerformance (and Zim Sailing for that matter), are loyal and outstanding sponsors of Sail1Design.
While our readers can draw their own conclusions on the arguments presented in the open letters, we also show excerpts from the response of the ICSA, from President Mitch Brindley, and the ICSA executive committee. These responses clearly show the opinion that this agreement is one that they had the authority to make. It also refutes allegations that this agreement goes against ICSA by-laws.
As a former college sailing coach who ordered the very first “super Larks” directly from England, a type of boat that had never before been in North America, let alone college sailing, and as someone who built and used totally clear mainsails with colored jibs ten years ago, I am all for fleet individuality and encouraging diversity in college sailing. The MIT program, led by Fran Charles, and The Tufts program, led by Ken Legler, are leaders in college sailing innovation and success. I modeled my program partially around their example, and I consider them two of the very top ICYRA/ICSA coaches in the (ICSA) organizations history. Their opinion matters, and should be taken seriously.
On the other side of the coin, college sailing is changing, constantly, and evolving, and becoming more structured and professional. To that end, one can make an argument that at the top level, the equipment should not be up for interpretation. Top-flight athletic competition should be about the athletes involved.
So in the Olympics, sailors don’t travel to China and sail the boats used most commonly at that local Chinese venue. The discipline’s equipment is pre-determined. What if in basketball, smaller teams used slightly lower heights for the basket at their home court? 10’ is standard, effectively removing it as a variable in the game. Is the ICSA simply responding to the growing professionalism in our sport, and cementing the equipment choice? With this agreement, we now know exactly what will be used at the sem-finals and the finals, regardless of venue. And, from a financial standpoint, sponsors are a welcome and necessary part of an organization such as the ICSA. Vanguard/LaserPerformance has been with college sailing for many years.
Or, as others may contend, is this agreement an unfair one, placing too much emphasis on sponsor relations at the cost of equity toward all of the college sailing programs that are the lifeblood of the ICSA? Will this further divide the ICSA? Does this place schools that do not have LP boats at a disadvantage? The difference between both the Olympic boat and basketball analogy when compared to ICSA boat standardization, is that unlike Olympic boats & basketball net height, sponsorhip investment is a guiding, relevant factor in the ICSA equipment choice.
I am confident that both sides of the argument have the best interests of the sailors in mind. We encourage your comments in our comment submission forum at the bottom of this article.
Tom Sitzmann, Sail1Design
Voice your opinion below and take our POLL
I used to have tremendous respect and appreciation for Vanguard. Laser Performance not so much. But now that college sailing has decided that our Rondar boats are all of a sudden no longer legal boats for college nationals….with the investment we have made…..are we supposed to sell them now, buy “official” boats so we can someday be as good as the other teams? Next summer when I see LP boats while coaching 420 clinics or running 420 regattas, I’m not sure if I should be rooting for our exclusive builder or rooting with all my heart for them to fail.
For all the teams that do not own Laser Performance Boats, you have my full support in fighting against this horrible and divisive arrangement.
back to top
Letter from Fran Charles:
It is with chagrin I have learned the news that you, as the President
of ICSA, have signed an eight year contract with Laser Performance
exclusively naming them as the only official boat builder at all
national and semi-final college championship regattas excluding
sloops. According to Article VII of the ICSA bylaws, The Board of
Directors is the only authority which can make changes to the
conditions of the National Championships and this agreement is
categorically a change to the conditions. It is also a change to the
Class Rules of the Collegiate Dinghy Class, which also requires
approval of the Board. Therefore, as President you have entered into a
contract purportedly on behalf of ICSA which you are not authorized to
sign. It is wrong to assume, with no public debate or even public
notice beforehand that this contract is in the best interests of
college sailing. ICSA should immediately renegotiate the contract
before LP ‘performs’ any of their services.
Furthermore, and more importantly, this contract is definitely not in
the best interests of college sailing. Laser Performance’s inattention
to the long term and immediate needs of some customers has created
healthy competition for the collegiate boat building market over the
past several years. This sponsorship agreement is a strategic move by
Laser Performance to keep their competitors out of the college sailing
market. If left in place, it will cripple the ongoing efforts to
develop faster, more tunable, more durable, and more fun-to-sail boats
for the future of college sailing as well as severely effect member
institutions that have already chosen to buy from other boat builders
who are responsible and responsive to the customer.
I am sure that your intentions were good but the process, legality,
and substantive consequences of this agreement are all wrong for the
ICSA and its member institutions. Because some of our members’ boats
are not manufactured by LP, they are now required to purchase fleets
of boats from a sole vendor if they wish to be considered a host for
the nationals or semi finals. The LP agreement only requires the
builder to provide boats for singles and the host schools must
purchase their boats at whatever price LP decides to charge for
dinghies, women’s, semis, and team racing.
There are many other schools who will make fleet purchases over the
life of this eight year contract who will be forced to buy from Laser
Performance, whether or not that equipment is the best value for their
program’s needs. That is not fair, nor healthy for our organization.
Fordham University, New York Maritime Academy, Columbia University,
University of New Hampshire, MIT, Tufts University and all the schools
using Performance Catamaran-built west coast FJs have invested
hundreds of thousands of dollars in collegiate boats which are now
excluded from hosting a championship. The Administration and Alumni of
these institutions will understandably be very concerned about the
exclusion of their school. Retroactively banning an institution from
hosting an event based on their choice of equipment supplier is a
blatant disregard for these schools. I am quite sure that you would
not have inked this deal if your fleet at Old Dominion University
would be subject to this ban.
As a Commonwealth of Massachusetts corporation, the ICSA is subject to
some of the broadest consumer protection laws in the country. Laser
Performance’s strategy to exclude competitors’ boats might constitute
illegal anti-competitive conduct, and through your actions ICSA is now
a party to Laser Performance’s plan. The ‘confidentiality agreement’
that you agreed to as a part of this contract precludes the member
institutions from knowing even an estimated value of this contract
that delivers the entire college sailing market to Laser Performance
until 2020. What exactly is it costing Laser Performance to get
exclusive rights to our market? There is no representation in any
ICSA meeting minutes that are available about the negotiation or
considerations of this agreement. Never was notice given to the
membership that this was an item to be considered by the Board of
Directors. This is egregious behavior which smacks of favoritism,
Mitch. The lack of transparency by you and the ICSA BoD makes the
membership feel suspicious of your motivations.
The need to have singlehanded boats for our championships is certainly
a concern for ICSA. Though the singlehanded discipline is a tiny part
of the collegiate schedule, it is a national championship that the
members support. However, with US Sailing having now chosen to work
with Zim Sailboats for their youth championship sponsorship with 420s
and Bytes for singles champs, Laser Performance is in an extremely
precarious position. They obviously view it as essential to have
college AND high school sailing singles hosted in their Laser design.
This agreement with ICSA does them a big favor. Granting LP the level
of concessions that you did in this agreement does far more for LP
than they are doing for college sailing. It is a very strange balance
of our priorities. There are other options for ICSA’s singlehanded
championship if LP is unwilling to work with us. Video production at
our championships is an ICSA need but this is a tiny cost to a company
which guarantees itself millions of dollars in boat sales over the
life of this agreement.
By granting an exclusive right to host all of our national
championships in LP-made boats, ICSA is making a long range commitment
to stifle competition in the institutional market. Recently, the
college sailing market has developed healthy competition from builders
who could offer alternative manufacturing processes, improved spare
parts inventories and service, and exciting changes in modern
equipment like cored hulls with resin infusion, gnav vangs, reef
points, and cassette style rudder stocks. In addition, improvements
like 420 bow bulkheads, angled thwarts, integrated bow bumpers, and
lighter rigs make our boats much safer, as well as more fun to sail.
These changes have ONLY come from schools that have been willing to
break away from the Laser Performance stranglehold. Now, ICSA is
poised to make a long range commitment to the company who has
repeatedly been unwilling to change anything until their market share
is threatened by other builders who innovate.
There needs to be public debate, full transparency, and the ICSA
should take very seriously its responsibility to hear every member
school’s concerns with respect. As a college sailing director I am
very concerned about this contract, the secrecy behind it, and the
detrimental consequences it has on many of the ICSA members. It is
wrong, unfair, and probably illegal.
back to top
Below are some facts as it relates to the sponsorship agreement
I. Authority to negotiate sponsorship agreements and claim of improper action of the ICSA President:
ICSA By-laws empower the President and the Executive committee to administer and develop the operational policies of the association, and conduct the daily business of the association. Furthermore the ICSA Sponsorship Guidelines (adopted by the ICSA BOD in 1989) give the President the specific authority to negotiate the sponsorship contracts, quoted below. This is in addition to the authorities and duties expressed in the ICSA By-Laws:
“ICSA Sponsorship Guidelines– Adopted June 1989; as amended through June 1997
The LaserPerformance sponsorship agreement is compliant with the current ICSA Conditions for National Championships. The conditions serve to broadly define the type of boat not the builder: “BOATS: SEMI FINALS & FINALS- The events shall be sailed in two-person dinghies of not less than 11 feet, or more than 15 feet, in length. The boats may be either sloop or cat-rigged. The use of two fleets of boats (one for each division) is permitted.”
Historically sponsorship agreements define the requirements of a championship host. These requirements are related to the championship host directly during the planning process. For example ICSA requires the use of the ICSA owned sails branded with sponsor logos for the Women’s, Dinghy, and Team Race Championships. This too is not specifically defined in the conditions. Such information is contained in documentation supplied to the hosts.
When examined, the Championship Conditions match the new agreement; meaning that nothing is in conflict with the agreement.
- I.Transparency:
It has been charged that the agreement was confidential and lacked transparency. In actuality, the contract was shared and reviewed multiple times by ICSA Executive Committee, and only after extensive input and negotiation from all of the members of the ICSA Executive Committee and the LaserPerformance Board of Directors was the agreement accepted. The Executive Committee did not take lightly the rights and obligations committed in this sponsorship agreement.To be perfectly clear, there is no intended secrecy, but all of the parties must adhere to the confidentiality of the terms as required and expected with many business agreements. Most of the negotiations took place over the summer; with the final approval coming on September 13, 2012. A report on the status of all sponsorships will take place at the Mid-Year ICSA Board Meeting. And the implementation of the terms of the sponsorship will be public.
- II.Misinformation about LaserPerformance
Statements made earlier were false and misleading. In regard to LaserPerformance being dropped by US Sailing, I have been assured that LaserPerformance terminated the contract with US Sailing effective July 2012, but continued to support the US Olympic Sailing Team, and many of its members on an individual basis, regardless of the contract termination. We are also very aware of LaserPerformance faithfulness to Collegiate sailing as can be illustrated by their commitment of considerable resources in regard to this contract. In fact, we are aware that LaserPerformance has committed 2 full time employees to insure that it is able to properly serve colleges and universities with their equipment and service needs. I am also aware of LaserPerformance’s initiative to develop and produce a new higher performance dinghy based on the current 420 platform with significant guidance from both college coaches and sailors alike. Certainly the actions of LaserPerformance are consistent with the needs of the ICSA.
- III.Exclusivity
Exclusivity is part of the reciprocal function of sports sponsorship agreements. All of our title sponsorship include category exclusivity rights and have as long as I have been involved in the management of the association. The charge that ICSA has acted in a way that embraces anti-competitiveness and compromises the investment of colleges who have bought boats from other sources is unfounded. The ICSA has never prevented any institution from buying boats or other equipment from any particular manufacturer. Similarly the NCAA doesn’t prevent a school from buying footballs from any manufacturer, utilizing them in practices and competitions; however the NCAA does require that the Official Football of the NCAA Championships, Wilson, is used for the NCAA Championships. It would be wrong for an institution to assume that by owning a fleet of boats that they are entitled to host a national championship in that fleet. The ICSA Championship & Competition Committee makes a point to have the competitive characteristics of its championships reflect the nature, and type of competition sailed every weekend throughout the year. With or without this agreement or the previous agreements that we have been operating under with LaserPerformance since 2000, the limiting factor in terms of fleet would be the ease, frequency, normalcy of access to that type of boat by all schools who compete in the event.
My dream
I’m sixteen and sailing every week. Just wanted to say you’re living my life dream. Thanks for the encouragement. It’s nice to know it’s actually possible.