Vice Commodore and Chairman of RHADC Sailing Committee Neil Redburn commented “This is the future of junior sailing if we are serious about increasing participation”
The Royal Hamilton Amateur Dinghy Club hosted what will likely go down as a “legendary” O’Pen BIC North American Championships. Sailors traveled from as far as Hawaii and France to join the fun and amazing Bermudian hospitality. Twenty races and an epic freestyle expression session were held in ideal conditions ranging from 6 to 20+ knots.
PRO Charles Tatem commented “This was one of the most fantastic children’s events I’ve ever been involved with – it is so positive to all the competitors and not just the few at the top. Everyone is encouraged to perform at their best and not someone else’s concept of what is best…….”
The racing was spectacular with a mixture of “conventional” and “Un-Regatta style” courses, sometimes with required freestyle moves, capsizes, stand-up sailing, and 360s. RHADC Sailing Director Nico Stefani commented “This really teaches the kids how to develop great boat handling skills, which can be transferred to skiffs and other high performance boats”
Going into the event it was unknown which sailors would prevail, but regardless of the course requirements the top sailors always came out on top. By the end it was clear the Bermudians were the class in the “O’Pen” age group while the Hawaiians cleaned up in the Under 13s. Mikey Wollmann came from behind in the last race to narrowly take out reigning Female 2013 Optimist and 2014 Byte North American Champion (and big sister), Ceci Wollmann by one point. Ceci will be representing Bermuda at this years Youth Olympics in China. Lars Von Sydow (Hawaii Kai Boat Club) rounded out the podium by eaking ahead of Peter Dill and Joe Arrowsmith from RHADC. Andre Stowasser representing the French Sailing Federation rounded out the top sailors overall. Kanoa Pick edged out fellow Hawaiians, JP Lattanzi and Marcos Baez, in the Under 13 age group. Close behind was the Miami Yacht Club team.
Nevin Sayre of Open BIC North America reminded everyone each day at the skippers meeting “All competitors were reminded of Rule #1 – Have Fun!”
The focus was on energised sailing with all sailors encouraged, regardless of ability and to have them coming off the water with smiles on their faces. A skateboard ramp, built by the Bermuda Skateboard Association, and a DJ playing some radical tunes, added to the cool factor off the water. Short, sharp races and quick turnarounds kept the sailors engaged and lunch breaks ashore with games added to the fun.
In the Freestyle competition, it was the young Hawaiians who also wow’ed the judges the most with an incredible display of boat handling, agility, and creativeness. The spectators went wild with Marcos’ now famous “plank walk”, tacks in front of the mast, and his fluid ability to steer the boat with just his weight. Close behind on the judges cards was the tandem team of JP and Pearl Lattanzi with Pearl’s gymnastic moves, head stands, climbing the mast and JP’s “happy dance”.
Every sailor left the regatta with new friends from around the world and individual accomplishment. The sailors’ improvement during the event was infectious. Based on their great success, the Royal Hamilton Dinghy Club is eager to host the O’Pen BIC Worlds in the near future, and it’s safe to say they will have full endorsement from all the participants. O’Pen BIC regattas are known for their focus on fun, learning, and sportsmanship. To see just how happy the kids were with the O’Pen BIC North Americans, check out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlaqcE194NM&feature=youtu.be
R.H.A.D.C would like to thank sponsors Arch Reinsurance Ltd., Bermuda Tourism Authority, BCL, Bermuda Forwarders, Tidal Asset Management and Isolated Surfboards without whom this would not have been possible.
Results and more photos can be found at:
https://www.facebook.com/rhadcbermuda
————————————————————————————————————————–
R.H.A.D.C. offers a full sailing program, following the US Sailing curriculum, with learn to sail, beginner, racing and advanced sailing classes for all ages including adult. We have a proud history of producing highly accomplished racers but also instilling a lifelong love of sailing in many more.
“Where Fun Happens”
The Royal Hamilton Amateur Dinghy Club
“Mangroville”
25 Pomander Road
Paget, PG BX
sailing@rhadc.bm
Blog
2014 Sail1Design US Team Racing Grand Prix
The Vanguard 15 Class in conjunction with Sail1Design will once again sponsor a Grand Prix Team Racing Series. The inaugural 2013 season saw great success with 20 teams scoring series points and the Rhode Island Pistols taking the series title. This year will feature a brand new event, the Buzzards Bay Regatta Team Race. This annual stop for the V15 Class will now be sailed in a Team Racing format.
Sponsors:
RITRA: RITRA(Rhode Island Team Race Association) will support these events with colored sails and team uniforms. They will also be providing professional race management at the BBR Team Race. Charter boats are available for all events thru RITRA.org
Sturgis: TBD
Atlantis: TBD
Other: Expect prizes from Sail1design and other sponsors. If your company wants to get in on the action send an email to series coordinator, Clinton Hayes –clintonearlhayes@gmail.com
Regattas:
Marblehead Team Race: June 21-22 http://www.easternyc.org/page/sailing/racing/team_racing
NYYC Team Race: July 26-27 http://www.nyyc.org/yachting/teamracing/2014-v15-teamrace
Buzzard Bay Regatta: August 2-3 http://www.buzzardsbayregatta.com
Format
Teams will earn points at each event based on their finish position. Scoring will be High Point to allow for teams to only sail 2 events and still potentially win the series. Only the top 12 teams will earn points at each event.
1st– 100 6th– 35 11th– 10
2nd– 80 7th– 30 12th– 5
3rd– 65 8th– 25
4th– 55 9th– 20
5th– 40 10th– 15
If there is a tie between two or more teams, each team’s best three of four scores shall be listed in order of best to worst, and at the first point(s) where there is a difference, the tie shall be broken in favor of the competitor(s) with the best score(s). If a tie remains, they shall be ranked in order of their scores in the last event, then next to last, etc.
Teams
A team is defined by their team name only. Any number or variation of individuals may sail in the series at any time. This eliminates the hassle of substitution rules and allows teams to sail with whoever they wish at each event. The point is to carry a consistent team name from event to event.
In Heaven, Everybody Team Races…
2014 J/70 Annapolis NOOD Regatta Report & Results
By Geoff Becker
Skipper: Will Welles Tactician: Geoff Becker Trimmer: Emory Williams Bow: Collin Leon
Day 3 2 races (Race 5, 4 legs…Race 6, 5 legs) Wind 10-15 knots from the West, with gusts up to 20 knots.
Building west winds provided some excitingly puffy and shifty conditions for the final day of the Annapolis NOOD Regatta. Upwind and downwind were challenging for the fleet as the breeze pumped up to 20+ knots and then would die down at times to around 8 knots. With the up and down winds today, many boats had up and down scores in the two races. Our team was no different, finishing in 22nd in Race 5, our worst race of the series, and then bouncing back with our best race finishing the regatta with a bullet in race 6. Our final score was good enough for 7th overall and we certainly had to be happy for that result after all the tough sailing during the regatta.
In shifty conditions many have a strategy to sail up the middle of the course and stay on the lifted tack. While that plan works well in most venues, the wind today was so puffy and shifty; the big changes in the wind seemed to come from the sides of the course. Big right puffs from the right and big left puffs from the left never seemed to be able to make it completely across the racecourse. When this happens, the two directions clash as they cross the racecourse and often there is much less wind and less favorable shifts in the middle.
These conditions were especially challenging when behind in the fleet, because the leaders would sail toward the sides leaving only the unfavorable middle free of traffic. When that happened today, we decided to choose a side that looked best overall and head to that side regardless of shifts on the way. This made catching up difficult because the only boats we were likely to pass were boats that tried to sail up the middle of the course.
This strategy also played true on the downwind legs and there seemed to always be more breeze on the edges. We tried to determine which side might have more breeze, while rounding the windward mark, and then sail higher angles to stay in the bigger pressure. That worked very well for us in the final race as both the higher angle and being on the edge of the course allowed us to get the boat up on a plane more easily and move us up to the front of the fleet.
Our takeaways from Day 3 are…
1. Sometimes the sides are best in shifty conditions.
2. Sail toward the side that will have the most pressure long term.
3. Use the edges downwind to stay in the biggest puffs.
FINAL RESULTS:
1 | USA 96 | Savasana | J 70 | Brian Keane | 4 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 28 |
2 | USA 51 | Black River Racing | J 70 | Doug Strebel | 6 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 35 |
3 | CAN 246 | Touch2Play | J 70 | Martin Kullman | 7 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 39 |
4 | USA 40 | B Squared | J 70 | Bryan Cameron | 13 | 8 | 4 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 50 |
5 | USA 85 | Ocho Cinco | J 70 | Allan Terhune, Jr | 3 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 20 | 2 | 56 |
6 | USA 187 | Catapult | J 70 | Joel Ronning | 1 | 1 | 20 | 11 | 17 | 9 | 59 |
7 | USA 2 | Scamp | J 70 | Will Welles | 14 | 10 | 7 | 12 | 22 | 1 | 66 |
8 | USA 482 | X | J 70 | Dan Cheresh | 2 | 33 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 17 | 73 |
9 | USA 217 | Joint Custody | J 70 | Jenn & Ray Wulff | 21 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 29 | 75 |
10 | USA 86 | Stampede | J 70 | Bruno Pasquinelli | 10 | 26 | 24 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 83 |
11 | USA 073 | Occams Razor | J 70 | Walt Pletcher | 20 | 7 | 11 | 3 | 16 | 28 | 85 |
12 | USA 45 | Wild Child | J 70 | Henry Filter | 12 | 9 | 19 | 5 | 26 | 16 | 87 |
13 | USA 35 | Moxie | J 70 | Cole Allsopp | 9 | 15 | 35 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 96 |
14 | USA 179 | AFRICA | J 70 | Ian Liberty | 23 | 11 | 15 | 13 | 11 | 23 | 96 |
15 | USA 209 | Trouble | J 70 | Peter McChesney | 8 | 12 | 38 | 37 | 3 | 8 | 106 |
16 | USA 151 | Reach Around | J 70 | Thomas Bowen | 5 | 5 | 13 | 28 | 2 | 57/DSQ | 110 |
17 | USA 218 | Tsunami | J 70 | Todd Olds / Thomas Iseler / Preben Ostberg | 15 | 17 | 10 | 34 | 19 | 21 | 116 |
18 | USA 364 | School’s Out | J 70 | John Aras | 43 | 4 | 16 | 9 | 36 | 15 | 123 |
19 | USA 34 | Perseverance | J 70 | Bennet Greenwald | 41 | 21 | 25 | 22 | 4 | 11 | 124 |
20 | USA 87 | Tick Tock Croc | J 70 | Richard Nesbett | 16 | 23 | 23 | 38 | 21 | 7 | 128 |
21 | USA 66 | Eagles Wings | J 70 | John Gottwald | 18 | 32 | 32 | 17 | 13 | 18 | 130 |
22 | USA 302 | Off-Piste | J 70 | Paul Cannon | 29 | 20 | 14 | 19 | 30 | 20 | 132 |
23 | USA 26 | Jungleland | J 70 | Chris and Carolyn Groobey | 31 | 22 | 27 | 26 | 18 | 14 | 138 |
24 | USA 15 | Junior | J 70 | Tim Finkle | 24 | 25 | 33 | 14 | 33 | 19 | 148 |
25 | USA 25 | Papawheelie | J 70 | Will Keyworth | 44 | 24 | 8 | 41 | 15 | 24 | 156 |
26 | USA 185 | Turbo Duck | J 70 | Bodo & Nick von der Wense | 33 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 24 | 27 | 156 |
27 | USA 152 | Sundog | J 70 | Kathy Parks | 17 | 31 | 9 | 39 | 23 | 38 | 157 |
28 | USA 46 | Alibi | J 70 | Tris Worth | 22 | 29 | 29 | 23 | 35 | 22 | 160 |
29 | USA 200 | Cat’s Pajamas | J 70 | Drake Johnstone | 11 | 30 | 22 | 32 | 12 | 57/DSQ | 164 |
30 | USA 199 | Mojito | J 70 | Catharine Evans | 46 | 16 | 26 | 29 | 25 | 26 | 168 |
31 | USA 44 | Gnixe | J 70 | Steiner/Lodico/Vickers Chip | 40 | 35 | 17 | 24 | 38 | 25 | 179 |
32 | USA 64 | Exit Strategy II | J 70 | Jack Martin | 45 | 18 | 28 | 21 | 37 | 30 | 179 |
33 | USA 38 | Goofyfoot | J 70 | John Wilsey | 25 | 41 | 31 | 45 | 29 | 12 | 183 |
34 | USA 192 | Turn the page | J 70 | David Becker | 37 | 39 | 44 | 10 | 28 | 36 | 194 |
35 | USA 219 | GetMyBoat | J 70 | Vortex Racing | 19 | 42 | 36 | 43 | 34 | 32 | 206 |
36 | USA 381 | Tea Dance Snake | J 70 | Peter Bowe / Todd Jenner | 38 | 38 | 34 | 25 | 27 | 45 | 207 |
37 | USA 91 | Carlos | J 70 | Mike Sudofsky | 27 | 27 | 47 | 42 | 32 | 35 | 210 |
38 | USA 220 | Phoenix | J 70 | Peter Firey | 26 | 28 | 40 | 48 | 43 | 34 | 219 |
39 | USA 159 | Torqeedo | J 70 | Brandon, Cindy, Lily & Dylan Flack | 35 | 19 | 21 | 33 | 57/DNC | 57/DNS | 222 |
40 | USA 497 | Chinook | J 70 | Frank McNamara | 36 | 34 | 37 | 31 | 42 | 43 | 223 |
41 | USA 230 | iZula | J 70 | Kenneth Smith | 34 | 37 | 39 | 35 | 49 | 40 | 234 |
42 | USA 243 | VitaminJ | J 70 | Ted Johnson | 32 | 46 | 45 | 44 | 44 | 33 | 244 |
43 | USA 375 | Lickity Split | J 70 | Stanley Edwards | 39 | 52 | 49 | 27 | 40 | 44 | 251 |
44 | USA 37 | lil’ Grizzly | J 70 | Charles Bayer | 28 | 40 | 42 | 51 | 41 | 57/BFD | 259 |
45 | USA 311 | 311 | J 70 | Kurt Winkelmann | 30 | 50 | 41 | 52 | 47 | 42 | 262 |
46 | USA 168 | Rarity | J 70 | Marty McKenna | 42 | 48 | 48 | 46 | 45 | 37 | 266 |
47 | USA 382 | Zombie | J 70 | Kristen Robinson | 48 | 44 | 51 | 47 | 39 | 41 | 270 |
48 | USA 154 | Spice | J 70 | Holly Graf | 51 | 49 | 53 | 30 | 51 | 39 | 273 |
49 | USA 365 | brotherly | J 70 | Kyle / Willy Comerford | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 40 | 31 | 31 | 273 |
50 | USA 357 | Danger Mouse | J 70 | Kristen Berry | 47 | 47 | 43 | 50 | 46 | 46 | 279 |
51 | USA 004 | Sport | J 70 | Mark Wagner | 49 | 43 | 46 | 53 | 48 | 47 | 286 |
52 | USA 10 | curragh | J 70 | Peter Tuite | 50 | 45 | 50 | 36 | 57/DNC | 57/DNS | 295 |
53 | USA 420 | E.L.E. | J 70 | Matt Braun | 52 | 51 | 30 | 57/DSQ | 50 | 57/DNS | 297 |
54 | USA 204 | Eowyn | J 70 | Peter Winkelstein | 53 | 53 | 52 | 49 | 57/DNC | 57/DNS | 321 |
55 | USA 362 | 362 | J 70 | David Wicker | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 342 |
56 | GBR 495 | Red | J 70 | Joe Woods | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 57/DNC | 342 |
___________________________________________
Day 2 1 race (course 4, 4 legs and downwind finish) Wind 6-8 knots from the SW, dying slowly during the race.
Light winds in the morning of Day 2 forced the RC to keep the fleet onshore under postponement for and hour until being sent out to the racecourse for a noon start. The postponement continued out on the water until after 1pm when, after several general recalls, only one race was completed in a light and dying SW breeze. Our team finished 12th in today’s race dropping us to 10th overall, but very close to the group of boats just ahead of us in the overall scores.
With the light winds today, boat handling became more delicate and critical in an effort to maintain speed during the maneuvers. Tacks, gybes, spinnaker sets and take-downs were places where a boat could sometimes gain distance when they were done smoothly and very easily lose distance when done poorly. Our boat-handling improved today and that was a result of the philosophy that smoother is better than bigger. Smooth and controlled maneuvers can be more easily performed and repeated by most every crew, where big boat handing can sometimes be difficult to execute accurately.
Boat handling with big rolls, big flattens and aggressive sail trim is impressive to watch and can sometimes help a boat make gains on the racecourse. However, such aggressive boat handling takes time and practice to master to the point where it can be consistently repeatable during a race. Also, when maneuvers go bigger, the margin for error becomes smaller and even the slightest miscue in timing can make a large negative impact on the outcome. In most cases, big boat handling done wrong, produces an outcome much worse than smooth maneuvers done accurately and under control.
Taking your time and making smooth and controlled maneuvers is the best way to produce repeatable, quality boat handling. Sometimes during a race, in the heat of the moment, “taking your time” is not the main focus. To assist in the timing of boat handing maneuvers, it can be helpful to assign someone on the crew to acts as a narrator during the tacks, gybes, etc.. That person can countdown to the maneuver, identify key timing points (like when to roll, when to flatten) and keep the whole crew working on the same timing. Using such a system and getting the timing of the whole crew coordinated is the best way to produce repeatable boat handling.
Our takeaways from Day 2 are…
1. Boat handling is more delicate in lighter winds.
2. Aggressive maneuvers are a harder to perform consistently.
3. Try to produce smooth and controlled maneuvers in light winds.
Day 1, 3 races (all course 4, 4 legs and downwind finish) Wind 6-14 knots from the West moving to the South for Race 3. Puffy and shifty today!_________________________________________________________
Three races were sailed today, Day 1 of the 2014 Annapolis NOOD, in a post frontal west wind that died out in the afternoon and was replaced by a southerly sea breeze. With the dying and shifting breeze, we saw some puffy and shifty conditions in our course area, the mouth of the Severn River and out in the Chesapeake Bay. The J/70 fleet had another large turn out for the NOOD, with 53 boats on a single starting line. Add the big fleet to the squirrely conditions and today was a real test of patience. Our team ended the day with a respectable 14th, 10th and a 7th earning us 8th place overall after Day 1.
The crew we have for this regatta has never sailed together as a group, even though in various combinations we have all sailed with each other on other crews. Because of that we had to expect some communication issues to occur as we got used to sailing together. Today’s challenging conditions and our new crew dynamic was a recipe for stress and friction on the racecourse today. In some of the cases we handled that friction well and in others not as much.
At one time or another, every sailor encounters stress and frustration during a race. How you deal with those situations can affect the opportunities for passing boats on the way to the finish line. Knowing what to say and how to interact with each other on the boat can help reduce stress and re-focus the group after some bad luck or a negative situation. In our case, being a new group, we found some situations where we just misunderstood what we were saying to each other. We were able to use the time between races to try and resolve those misunderstandings instead of trying to hash it out during the race. Addressing miscommunication issues during a race can easily snowball out of control and surely will detract from the crew’s focus in the race and moving toward the finish line.
Every crew is different, so any method used to reset the stress onboard and refocus the crew will also have to be different. Calm discussions after the race are always a good way to address friction during a race. Trying to solve communications issues during the heat of battle is very difficult and likely impossible. Something simple to try, to help refocus the crew, is to have the conversation stop on the boat altogether for a short period of time. One phrase to use could be, “Ok, 5 minutes of just sailing, no talking.” This gives everyone a chance to take a deep breath, reset and get back to making the boat move forward toward the finish.
Our takeaways from Day 1 are…
1. Try to stay patient in tough conditions.
2. Keep communication lines open and helping the boats performance.
3. Reset the crew when friction becomes distracting to sailing the boat.
College Sailing Notebook: Gearing Up for Nationals
By Airwaves writer & Brown U. sailing team member Lydia Whiteford
The entire spring season, and really the entire year in college sailing, has been progressing towards this: teams all over the country have had or will have in the next week or so the qualifying regatta that will get them to nationals.
The college sailing national championships are quite an ordeal. They are made up of 3 parts, all of which are qualified for separately. The first is the Women’s division fleet racing nationals, which are sponsored by Sperry. They kick off nationals every year, and are conducted over 4 days. The first day and a half (ending on the second day of sailing at noon) is the “semifinals”. In the past, the top first or second place finishers in the regional qualifiers would advance straight to nationals, and would not have to compete in the semifinals. Then, the top 9 from the semifinal regatta would advance to nationals to join them. This year, however, no boats got to advance straight to nationals, and will all be competing in the semifinals. This means that the semifinal regatta will be split into 2 fleets, with the top nine from each advancing to nationals. Nationals and semis are all held in the same place, so if your team advances it is effectively like one long regatta.
Directly after women’s, the Team-Racing nationals begins, taking place over 3 days and sponsored by Annapolis Performance Sailing. This regatta has no semifinals, as the nature of the regatta eliminates people as the regatta progresses. It is set up so that one or two “round robins” are sailed, in which every team faces each other and then their records are calculated to do the same thing but with the top 12 teams, then the top 6 teams, or how ever the regatta chair decides to set it up. Gradually, teams are eliminated until there is a winner.
Finally, after team racing, the College Sailing National Fleet Race championship is held, and is sponsored by Gill. Historically, the semifinals for this event were separate from the championship, with the regattas taking place at different times. However, this year they’ve changed it so that it is structured like women’s, with the semifinals and the championship being back to back. So, just like women’s, all the teams that qualified out of their district will compete and the top 9 from 2 different fleets will make up the national championship roster.
With so many policy changes this year, the qualifiers schedule was much different across the board than it has been in the past. This year, ICSA decided to construct the season so that all major team racing was to take place in the first half of the season and all major fleet racing in the second half. Usually, the qualifiers would both be regattas that were almost back-to-back in the middle of May. This year, however, they were separated because of the regatta schedule, and therefore everything seemed to be bumped up. Now, most districts have completed all 3 of their qualifiers, with more than a month of post-season until the big event. Qualifiers put quite a strain on the sailors, no matter the difficulty of the district they are. These are the regattas when coaches pull out all the stops: coming to regattas with an armada of sailors, often times multiple boat’s worth for each division. There are heavy crews, light crews, and everything in between. Many sailors have to constantly switch modes, as many of them sail in all three categories of qualifiers. Some of the larger districts, such as MAISA and NEISA, are so competitive that you see completely different teams going to each event, and qualifying for one does not mean by any stretch that you will qualify for all. So, with the season drawing to an end, congrats to all of those teams that have made it and good luck to those still qualifying. The ICSA nationals will be held at the U.S. Naval Academy and St. Mary’s College of Maryland from May 27th to June 6th, and here is a preliminary list of the qualifiers (many schools are still undergoing their qualifying events at the moment)
Co-Ed Fleet Racing:
University of Michigan
University of Minnesota
University of Wisconsin
University of Notre Dame
University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee
Yale University
Dartmouth College
Boston College
Coast Guard
Brown University
Tufts University
Bowdoin College
Connecticut College
Harvard University
Georgetown University
St. Mary’s College of Maryland
U.S. Naval Academy
Old Dominion University
University of Pennsylvania
Fordham
University of Virginia
Washington College
Stanford University
University of Hawaii
University of California at Santa Barbara
University of Southern Florida
College of Charleston
Eckerd College
University of Jacksonville
Clemson University
New College of Florida
Women’s Fleet Racing:
Western Washington University
College of Charleston
Eckerd College
University of Southern Florida
Georgetown University
U.S. Naval Academy
Old Dominion University
Cornell University
Hobart and William Smith
Fordham
Yale University
Boston College
Dartmouth College
University of Rhode Island
Brown University
Coast Guard
Bowdoin College
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Texas A&M
Stanford University
University of Hawaii
University of California at Santa Barbara
Team-Racing:
Texas A&M
University of Wisconsin
University of Michigan
Roger Williams University
Yale University
Boston College
Tufts University
University of Washington
College of Charleston
University of Southern Florida
St. Mary’s College of Maryland
Georgetown University
U.S. Naval Academy
Old Dominion University
Luke Muller Interview: Youth Standout Prepares for College Sailing
Follow Up on Luke Muller by Airwaves writer Grace Lucas
The past couple of months have been a blur for most high school sailors who are seniors – trying to cram in college visits, time for applications, and schoolwork into a very short period of time; however, it was no surprise that Luke Muller was recruited to one of the most competitive sailing schools in the nation – Stanford. There is no doubt that Luke will continue to have success in the future and it is definitely worth keeping an eye out for this upcoming household name in the sailing world.
Back in August he was selected to be the Sail1Designer of the Month, (https://www.sail1design.com/muller/) after his first place finish in the Radial at Youth Champs in Corpus Christi this past summer, with half of the points of the 2nd place boat. Since then, he has had some significant wins, such as 1st place at Orange Bowl in December 2013 in the Radial, which is arguably the most competitive youth fleet in the nation. Luke has also been selected to represent the United States at Youth Worlds in Portugal this summer, along with the US Sailing Development Team.
Read more about his recent success and future plans for sailing below:
S1D: When you came out of the Opti, what made you decide to sail Lasers instead of other common youth boats?
I guess it was mostly fate. I usually put myself in the most difficult/rewarding option when making decisions so the Laser was a good choice with its reputation as being one of the hardest fleets in the world but also has a history of turning out some of the greats in sailing, which is humbling and inspiring. I was also growing like crazy so I fit in the strap well.
S1D: What is your favorite aspect of sailing Lasers?
Coming in from a long and tough day happy with what I did.
S1D: You mentioned in your last interview that you trained using the CrossFit program. What aspect of that program is most beneficial when it comes to sailing?
You know, since then I haven’t been doing much CrossFit because of my recent switch back down to the radial but CrossFit has some really great benefits in keeping you fit and harnessing your mental toughness, which is key in any task.
S1D: You were recently accepted to Stanford for sailing, do you have any worries about transitioning from Lasers to college FJs and 420s?
No, I love learning new things and accepting new challenges so I’m actually looking forward to sailing them.
S1D: How does it feel to be chosen for the Sperry Topsider youth development team?
It feels great. The leaders of the team are really steering the whole program in the right direction and it is really exciting being one of the first group of sailors feeling the benefits of this new leadership.
S1D: Do you intend to continue to train with the youth development team while sailing at Stanford?
Yes
S1D: Do you have any long-term goals for sailing? Do you have any specific plans in place to achieve them?
It’s always been my dream to go to the Olympics, do a Volvo, and sail in the America’s Cup and I hope I can hold on to that dream for as long as possible.
S1D: How are you preparing yourself for Youth Worlds this upcoming summer in Portugal?
The US team is now based out of Long Beach so I’ll be spending a lot of time out there this summer preparing for the worlds.
S1D: Do you have a favorite drill? What about a favorite leg of the course?
Favorite drill…..hmm practice isn’t really ever fun haha I’m joking.
I like really short course racing with a tight group of fast sailors. It’s a drill where every mistake is magnified and you have to be almost perfect to win. It gets pretty intense.
Favorite leg….I like the second upwind because people start to lose their focus and it is a leg that provides a lot of opportunity to make big gains for those who are still making good observations and putting out 100% physically.
Communication for Speed!
By Andrew Kerr
Picture yourself on port tack, going fast – with a wall of starboard tackers coming at you that you can barely see but you know their bows are charging at you!
Your team communicates well and is all on the same page, you cross the first 3 starboard tackers and then do a smooth duck on the last one before tacking on to the lay line for the weather mark. The whole situation seems almost routine – why? One strong element is that the team was communicating well as each team member was apprised of the situation and their subsequent role in it.
In particular – new teams, boats with new crew and teams that haven’t sailed together for a while would be well served to sit down together and talk about the communication / terminology that all on the team can quickly understand in the heat of competition and implement and execute with.
I typically sail with a wide variety of teams in a fairly wide variety of classes and have found it helpful to ask the team I am sailing with what type of and how much communication they like.
It is particularly important to get on the same page terminology wise – for instance needing to communicate that we need to go faster might be termed “ bow Down fast forward” by one person, “bear off” by another, “ foot mode” by another and so on!!
There essentially is no point communicating things the skipper doesn’t understand! Have you ever noticed sometimes that a team goes silent after a bad start and is fighting it out in the back of the fleet on the first beat? If you recognize this trait in your team, then now is the time to try and change it – be the one to start prompting the team to communicate – whether it be puffs, angles, waves or looking for lanes and opportunities, it gets the team back in the game and before you know it you will be passing boats and getting back in the race.
The trick is to all agree on the terminology so there is no misunderstanding. One of the
Challenges of good communication is formulating way’s to get across your observation / idea to the rest of your team in the most efficient and understandable way. Let’s look at a suggested communication model for a five person J24 that also can be applied to other boats as well.
Imagine you’re self on the rail as tactician trying to describe to the skipper how your team is doing against 20 or so boats that are to windward and on the same tack.
Here is a suggestion – divide the fleet into thirds – the initial (closer) third, the middle third and the top (most windward) third. The communication would go like this: “Initial group is bow down, middle group is bow even and the top group is bow up” That may be followed up by an overall performance analysis of – “it’s net gain/net even/ net loss to us”. Now like all the management courses tell you – if it is a net loss then we need to bring a solution to the table rather than simply present a problem! No need to kill the messenger here!
That reason may be that they have more breeze, a favorable wind shift or could simply be going faster. If the latter – why? Look at their set up – pay particular attention to the other boats forestay tension & Genoa halyard tension and how much backstay they have on and compare it to your setting also note what mode of sailing are they in – “ a fast forward bow down mode or a bow up height mode.
Let’s break the race down in to segments and look at the basic communication roles that each team member has. We will assume that the tactician/ strategist in this example are the middle person.
Before the start/ practice & preparation time:
This a perfect time to get the communication flowing – hoist the Genoa, go upwind and get settled in and then start the communication flowing both upwind and downwind , once the dialogue is established then we have a model & understanding for which we can build on . If you are sailing with a new team this is a perfect time to talk out what is understandable to everyone on board and what your communication role is going to be.
On the final approach to the start:
Bow: Communicates distance to the line in boat lengths using hand signals – communicates where other boats are and looks through the Genoa vision window to warn of encroaching boats. An example of this is – “Do you see bow 32 and 71 “?
Note: Try to do this off the bow as much as you can on smaller keel boats by crouching at the shrouds with an occasional run up to the bow for a confirmation – this keeps the weight off the bow and also increases skipper vision.
Mast: Communicates time clearly – a good technique is to make eye contact with the skipper when calling the time so they are under no uncertain terms of the time.
Middle: Warns the skipper of boats to windward and behind who may try to reach down and overlap to leeward late in the starting sequence an example might be – ‘ watch # 65 he might try to hook us “ .
Verbalizes the big picture to the team from a strategy standpoint – “there is more breeze left and the line is square – let’s start to the left of midline”.
Communicates clearly the broadcast on the VHF Radio and also communicates any flags that may have been hoisted from the RC – also backs up on time calling if necc.
Cockpit: Warns the skipper of boats approaching from clear astern and boats to leeward – particularly port tack approaches – an example of this – “ do you see # 22 “ and points at that boat as well as making eye contact with that skipper
I have seen the top cockpit crews do this – it firstly alerts the skipper to the port tacker and also communicates to that port tacker that they have been seen and defensive action ( Usually bow down and aiming at them to make them tack early or duck you) is about to happen.
The cockpit also communicates how much space to leeward there is and when the leeward boats are accelerating – “#27 is trimming on and is getting bow forward on us , we have a good gap to work “.
Skipper: Communicates whether we want to go fast or slow/ hold position. This can be done easily by the words “speed” or luff”.
It should be noted that a bad start very often includes a lack of team clarity on any one of these aspects – in particular the skipper losing a sense for where the line is at 15 seconds or the time not being communicated clearly. It’s so important that your team is all on the same page here.
The challenge of starting – particularly in a big aggressive fleet is that it is a series of one on one situations that happen in rapid succession – thus the necessity for different teams members to take on concise communication roles .
It is really important for the crew to provide concise information to the skipper but then to let them execute the start. The skipper doing there own start will enable them to continue to develop there own skills ( time & distance, gap and special awareness) and instincts in conjunction with concise verbalized observations that we have noted prior.
Upwind:
Bow:
Communicates puffs, light spots, flatter water and waves and where the mark is; “Big puff coming in 3, 2, 1 and it sustains, mark is at 11 o’clock”. It is very helpful to know if the puff does sustain (hold) or not so your team knows how much and how long we may have to depower the boat.
Very often calling the lulls and how long they last is neglected and this costs a team many boat lengths. A good example of good communication here would be: “Light spot coming in 3, 2, 1 and it last for about 10 lengths”.
Critical communication for the bow person going upwind is boats converging with your team through the Genoa window – especially in a big fleet!
Poor communication hear can lead to some theatric maneuvers that were not planned on!
An example of excellent communication would be: “ 2 starboard tackers coming about 40 seconds away in the middle of the window – looks like we are bow to bow with them – do you see them? ‘ Important note here is some teams prefer a time estimate and some a boat lengths estimate – find out what the preference is or what is more understandable.
Using the Genoa vision window is a great tool for judging crossings – if the approaching boat is in the forward part of the window they are likely crossing ahead, if they are in the middle of the window they are likely bow to bow with you and if they are in the back part of the window you are likely crossing them.
In Choppy conditions it is very beneficial for the bow to communicate a flat spot for the team to tack in – “good flat spot in 2 boat lengths”. Anyone that has ever tacked into the biggest chop set of the day will appreciate this!
Keep it up – keep calling the puffs, waves & lulls and don’t get down if you feel you are missing some of them or not doing it perfectly.
I remember years ago during a regatta taking a break from it on one portion of a windward leg as I thought I was off beat in my calls – as soon as I stopped calling the wind – Rod Johnstone (who was on the rail next to me) said some encouraging words – –“keep it up, Jeff (Johnstone) is listening and it’s helping us a lot”. Ever since, both in my own sailing and coaching I have encouraged people to keep taking there swings at it as it helps keeps the team alert and in the race.
Mast: Helps relay compass #’s and looks for the mark. “Mark is at 11 o’clock”. A really good one is when the mast person takes over calling puffs/ waves while the bow is putting the guy in the pole – “ Big puff in 2, 1, followed by a chop set “ . This back up communication is excellent and is one of the hallmarks of the good teams.
Middle:
Communicates speed and height versus the competition and overall positioning (see prior communication suggestion at the beginning of the article).
Asks the skipper how the boat feels and communicates to the skipper what mode of sailing the team should be in – i.e.: fast forward, (bow down, Genoa sheet eased, Mainsheet slightly eased) or in “height mode” (bow up, trim tighter, sailing with a narrow groove) to possibly pinch another team off. “Let’s get in height mode here – there is more wind just to weather of us” or “ lets go fast forward here , there is more breeze straight ahead” would be a good example of the middle s communication. Another one would be – “the fleet is heading to the right, lets pick a spot and go with them”.
Translates what the compass numbers mean is invaluable – particularly off the starting line and also rounding the leeward mark – “we are up 5 degrees “, “we are at the Median heading “, and “we are down 10 degrees on this tack compared to last time”. Being specific here is the key element and keeping the number of words to a bare minimum for simplicity will be the way to go in all instances.
Cockpit:
Talks with the skipper about the gap the Genoa trim – “am at max trim “, “am in eased mode”. One of the hardest scenarios is in light air when the wind is shifting faster than the skipper can steer to – if the wind lift and the outside telltale stalls a good communication is : “ I am eased,” or “we are lifted” ( While easing the sail out to reattach the flow to the outside part of the sail).
In light air the trimmer will be sitting to leeward and can verbalise the performance of the boats to leeward and also the separation between the team and the leeward boat. This can be particularly helpful off the starting line – “good gap to leeward you have room to go bow down if you want” – other examples would be – “boats to leeward are in fast forward mode and are gaining”,” good separation on the boat to leeward, net gain us”.
Skipper:
Can verbalize the compass numbers as they are in their range of vision and ask for input once in a while if it is not forthcoming. Talks about how the boat feels and whether there is enough power, also talks about what mode of sailing is required for the given boat to boat and strategic situations.
“We thought you meant go – not no!!”
It is not uncommon to see communication lapses between a starboard tacker who does not want a port tacker to cross and a port tacker who thinks the starboard tacker is waving them to cross. !
If your team wants a port tacker to cross (rather than get lee bowed) then the best thing to say is “Cross”, cross!” If a team say’s “no “it could be interpreted as “go” and vice versa.
Important note here – and especially in a big fleet is that it is very often far better to tell a port tacker to cross – as you may be lifted, going fast and in a great lane and the last thing you want is to be lee bowed and slowed down or impeded in any way.
Downwind:
Especially with a bigger fleet – maintaining a lane of clear air and positioning for the next puff become paramount. As well as inside position at the respective gate mark (if there are two leeward marks.
The team has to maintain the same intensity that they had at the start and the first leg and this can be achieved through concise and consistent communication to help the team go fast in the given conditions and circumstances.
Very often teams fall silent going downwind if they are behind ( just like after a bad start) this is where you have to pick it up , look harder , be more observant and get every scrap of info that you can to gain places. Keep the dialogue going and intensity level as if you were in the lead, it will pay dividends.
Bow:
Helping look for wind and scanning and verbalizing where the marks (s) are a big here. “Mark is at eleven O ‘clock, big puff forming up to beam in 3, 2, and 1 – now “would be an example of good communication and heads up sailing.
Mast: Some good communication here is relaying the compass #’s to the middle and also asking the trimmer & skipper how the pole height is and vang tension looks. “How’s pole height? I think the vang is too tight – how does it look? “
Middle: The middle crew is communicating lanes of wind and verbalizing jibing opportunities and fleet performance analysis as well as keeping track of Compass $’s to make sure the team is on the correct jibe.
They are talking about the net gains or losses versus boats that are on the other jibe and the angles that the boat s behind are sailing.
A good example would be “boat behind sails 5 degrees higher than us, now he is same angle, our air is clear; its net gain versus the boats on the other jibe”. More info would be: “I like where we are, we have been headed on the compass and are on the closest jibe to the mark, the starboard gate is favored in this shift”.
Any concise communication that you can come up with that eloquently and to the point states your observation is going to help the team understand what is required and the tactical scenario.
Cockpit:
A really good spinnaker trimmer focuses on the sail all the time and doesn’t get distracted. The communication from the middle and the dialogue they have with the skipper paints the picture for them of where the team is on the racecourse.
The trimmer’s communication would typically be – “pressures starting to develop (on the spin sheet), hold that angle, now pressures good – come down 5 degree, ok no lower”. The communication can be even more specific “down two degrees, hold, no lower, up 3 degrees, great, tight there, no higher”. This communication is so valuable on those puff / lull days that present the team with good opportunities to gain.
One of the goals of this ongoing and specific communication from the spinnaker trimmer is to ensure that the team does not sail too low in the lulls and too high in the puffs.
As a trimmer one’s ongoing goal is to provide consistent and specific communication on the trim to help the boat go fast and at the right angle as much as possible in the range of conditions.
Skipper:
The real focus here from a communication standpoint is listening to the crew communication, double checking where the mark is and noting compass heading changes for shifts. If the communication is not forthcoming then some verbalized prompters such as “where is the best breeze?” “Is our air clear? How are we doing versus the boats that jibed? ‘And so on may be necessary.
At the leeward mark – Negotiate early!
In observing big fleets round the leeward mark one of the hallmarks of a disciplined fleet are very few protests and the fleet rounding in single file (bow to stern) and not blocks of boats rounding on the outside.
This year I watched some of the races at the UK J24 Nationals and observed some excellent mark roundings with very few protests, the hallmark of a good caliber fleet.
To me this indicates teams who have negotiated their overlaps or lack of overlaps early and then have focused on the best rounding possible.
Important note here is that most of the time it is better to round behind someone with clearer air and the option to tack rather than outside them, in bad air and with little or no option to tack.
Good communication approaching the leeward mark would be for the skipper (or your designated communicator) to start the dialogue early with the skippers of the other boats – “# 52 we are overlapped, #77 no overlap “etc.
Now obviously this can change later on but what you have done is opened up the dialogue to reduce the potential for late mis understandings.
Keep the process going:
The bulk of this article is suggestions on your team’s communication – the composition and style of each team is different so the communication channels & content may be different.
I have found that you just cannot get too good at this, there are always’s better, more concise way’s of expressing observations in a concise and understandable way, I try to come up with new ways as much as I can both in my role as a coach and in my own sailing.
The important thing though is that those channels are open and that the team has established a foundation so that everyone is on the same page with the type and amount of communication that is required for each scenario that you meet on the race course. Very best of luck at your next regatta.